16app

I haven't heard back from them with regards to my post-interview email.

Oh I wasn't referring to the first station. The presentation prior to the interview made clear the 1st and last stations were interactive. I think a lot of people had the same issue as me, judging by the posts above, and I'm pretty sure we are talking about the same/similar scenario. lol. Although I tried answering in first person, in retrospect I think it was not supposed to be that way. Especially since in the follow up questions the interviewer was not 'in character'. LOL. It's funny how awkward it was looking back at it. I have no idea if this ambiguity is grounds for re-assessing the station. I personal think the answers are very different if you address it in 1st person vs 3rd person. I emailed admissions about it because I thought it was a concern. If you guys think so too maybe email about it as well? I'm sure in any MMI scenario the directions should be clear, even if the issues and solutions might be ambiguous. Anyhow those are my very cheap 2 cents on this topic.

There was one station in A2 that I thought could've been worded better. Without going into specifics, I personally found the instructions vague because I wasn't sure if I should approach the interviewer in 1st person or answer the question in 3rd person. I felt the interviewer saw my point but ofcourse he couldn't do much except reiterate the question during the interview. lol. If anyone else found the same perhaps it might be important to bring up with the ad com? I have emailed them about it and am still waiting for an answer. Other than that the interview experience was wonderful. Everyone went out of their way to make us relaxed and comfortable. To the point I'm glad just to have been part of the experience regardless of the outcome. Although an acceptance would very much solidify my feelings. lol.