Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums

regular

Members
  • Content count

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. regular

    I'm done

    Worse case scenario, you will still get family medicine if you put some effort into the remaining years. That itself is still a way better career than most other people. One fail will make it harder if you are going for a competitive specialty, but it's not impossible and you can still make up for it since you are so early on and I'm sure most residency directors care more about your personality/work ethic than a transcript.
  2. Dermatologist performing liposuctions kills patient Just an example of how your own shared videos of dancing during surgery can come back as evidence against you.
  3. Anything over 0% is too much and I can't think of any patient that deserves to be at risk of that.
  4. There are pretty much no effective treatments for antisocial and psychopathic behavior. Letting them back out, let alone practice medicine has time and time again shown to be a bad idea hence the creation of a dangerous offender registry because the chance for recidivism is so high. Besides, seeing how so many new grads have trouble finding permanent positions after residency, allowing someone with a criminal record to practice medicine seems to wrongly see the criminal as a victim and not society. The person that they assaulted or raped will forever be a affected long after the bad guy has served his time. The trust the public puts in physicians is delicate and this is no time to be nice and ruin it for the overwhelming majority of the normal doctors.
  5. Sorry for the personal attack, I did not mean it that way. I have strong feelings for this subject as I am in anesthesia and having spoken to colleagues that work in the US, encroachment by midlevels is a serious problem. The issue started from some well-meaning folks that are initially tried to fix a shortage of anesthesiologists by having nurses provide anesthetic care in the military and rural areas. Afterwards, greedier anesthesiologists started utilizing them to increase their income and reduce their workload since they could bill for multiple rooms while just supervising the nurses. After a while, eventually the nurses will not see the need for physicians to supervise them and that is what's happening today with some states granting independent practice to nurses. In the end, more patients will be cared for by less well-trained professionals and cost savings will not be that drastic either. The specialty of anesthesia in the US has also suffered and it is definitely not a choice for the most competitive graduates anymore. I hope that your idea of having more NPs not harming family medicine is correct, but if they were to become even more prevalent, it's likely you will see the percentages of grads choosing family medicine drop even more. The proper solution to a lack of primary care is not to marginalize physicians and bring in cheaper personnel as replacement since just introduces a race to the bottom. Properly funding family physicians to make it a financially viable to run full-service clinics would be much better in the long run.
  6. I really hope Ralk isn't on any positions of significant authority because family doctors with his/her attitude are helping to undermine their own specialty.
  7. As with all midlevels, first they are happy being supervised but after a while they will push for more autonomy. After a while, they may even become your boss Meet the NP that hires family docs to run her clinic .
  8. Based on the fact that the process to enter medicine is much more difficult than nursing school. I don't think it's even debatable to say the average physician has proven they can learn and adapt better than the average RN (again outliers exist in both).
  9. As someone who chose not to do Family Medicine partially related to discussions like this, I think that these sentiments devalue the work of our Family Physician colleagues. If someone was a medical student, knowing that NPs were encroaching on Family Medicine territory would make it seem much less attractive. Why bother going through so many years of training if NPs are advertised as equivalent care. One might as well specialize so that you're not just doing what a nurse can be allowed to do. Hiring more NPs will not improve the lack of family physicians. Promotion of midlevels just provides lower quality care. There are great NPs out there and horrible Family physicians, but the I am sure the distribution of quality is different.
  10. regular

    No one to ask for references :(

    I got mine by being a year-long voluntary teaching assistant for a professor in our undergraduate program.
  11. They could screen people like with insurance to ensure you don't have a mental illness that would precipitate blowing it all on whim. However, that would probably violate some human rights legislation. This case could hurt the the thousands of other medical students who rely on loans if the banks were to clamp down.
  12. regular

    What I Learned

    There are enough high GPA applicants that they can find people with both good AQ and NAQs. Why pick someone with only good NAQ when you can easily get both with the huge number of applicants?
  13. regular

    Ont Gov Capping Physician Pay

    Considering that they bumped up medical school admissions and now so many specialists are having trouble finding jobs, unilateral pay cuts haven't come sooner.
  14. regular

    Re-applying to CaRMS

    Are they still allowed to defer graduating after going thru two matches? Kinda crazy how it's starting to feel like applying to medical school all over again.
  15. My point is that the College of Family Physicians has been striving to improve the standing of family medicine (ie. creating a separate college and moving away from the term GP, increasing FP teaching in medical schools to counter specialist bias). The scarcity of Family Medicine spots in an increased applicant pool only helps them achieve that goal more.
×