You know, humans like to do this thing we call "joking". Feel free to look into it I think it's pretty clear to everyone that it is statistically impossible for pure looks to be a factor in a higher percentage of women being accepted to schools across Canada (it's not possible for every admissions ccommittee to be biased in this way with so many applicants). If you read the entire thread, you will actually find a lot of us praising women for tending to be more caring, mature, and confident, and the fact that they dominate the top of the GPA curve in undergraduate.
But you ignore all of that and focus on one comment about how BC girls look good and magically connect that to a patriarchal society. Don't take this in a bad way but I think you're a perfect example of an individual using confirmation bias. You completely ignore the evidence (ie. comments praising women) that don't match your world view of patriarchy and decide to focus on a single comment that was said in passing and in humor but that sort of supports how you see the world.
Either way, even if you're completely right and everyone here is a women hating demon, it doesn't change anything because there is still a significant advantage in being a women and being admitted. So any discrimination here (assuming it exists) is imaginary whereas in the real world, there is a real gender discrepancy and males are on the disadvantaged end - whatever the reason or combination of reasons actually is.
Please be rational