Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums

命运的羽毛

Members
  • Content Count

    311
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

命运的羽毛 last won the day on June 14 2015

命运的羽毛 had the most liked content!

About 命运的羽毛

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,503 profile views
  1. O and I did go downstairs last year to ask,,,they told me no special treatment for Canadians but all internationals are treated as OOS.
  2. Not sure if the number is correct. A Chinese girl at SLU said this year there're only 6 visa students accepted (3 Canadians, 1 Russian, 2 Chinese).
  3. Correct me if I'm wrong since it's been a few years but I thought the application opens to submission in the end of June, therefore don't you need the score ready before then?
  4. If you just need to pass, at your level, probably just FA is enough.
  5. Build a chart-review database --> stats analysis on x parameters --> x amount of papers. That's how a girl in my school got her 6 first-author paper out and matched into ophthalmology in a good program.
  6. Nah...they know bench work takes 10x more efforts and time than chart reviews. But the point is, for a undergrad/med student, basic research is not cost-effective. One basic research 1st author paper may beat one chart-review 1st author paper, but two chart-review 1st author paper will beat 1 basic research paper. Considering it's possible to pump out 6 clinical papers in a summer while the minimum amount of time to finish a basic research project is 6 months, it's not to anyone's interest to pursue a basic research project if the goal is to get a paper out. Also, the chance of getting a basic research paper out is significantly lower than clinical research. I always find it amusing that some students talk about going to a lab and getting a paper out like it's set in stone. At least in the lab I just worked in, we haven't had a single undergrad/med student first author paper out, and we had tons of undergrad/med students working in our lab. People have a tendency to over-estimate their ability and their fate (for example I thought I could publish a IF=20 paper in a year when I first started). Of course, unless someone is really interested in doing western and pcr and doesn't care about what he/she can get out in the end, then by all means go for it.
  7. first author basic research paper>first author clinical research paper>>>>>co-authored paper>>>>>>>>no paper. Doesn't matter how much more prestigious one lab is compared to the other, if you can't get a paper out, you fail (quote an ophthalmologist I spoke to a couple of years ago: "no paper, no LOR.") BTW co-authored paper is all about politics. I was offered a co-authorship by proof-reading a colleague's manuscript (I felt bad so I did do some experiments for her in the end but you get the gist) because we are gossip buddies.
  8. Yeah I've always felt a little bit uncertain about "Canadian treated same as American" statement in certain med schools. Doesn't quite fit the whole political correct movement. Ppl might start ask questions like "Canadians don't pay tax to US government so why should they be treated differently than other foreigners?"
  9. boring is such a subjective feeling. all i know is i have a family friend who smells, not particularly smart, and went to waterloo for actuerial science and is having a more than good life right now. certainly beats my life. he doesn't find his job boring either.
  10. nice thread. UVA i'm not sure if they really treat canadians as oos americans, i'll go down there today to confirm. nothing on their website that mentions it.
  11. Moore's for studying, HY anatomy for notes taking and exam prep.
  12. actuarial science or accounting beats both.
×
×
  • Create New...