Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


adhominem last won the day on June 22 2017

adhominem had the most liked content!

About adhominem

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

1,196 profile views
  1. adhominem

    Life Experience And Achievement Section.

    You should include an entry for awards if you feel they're significant. When adcoms personnel take your transcript and calculate your GPA, the awards on your transcript probably aren't even given a second look (or they probably aren't factored into your EC score, at least).
  2. adhominem

    Additional Comments Essay

    I got a very similar sounding email, sounds like they're just giving cookie cutter copy/paste responses to the question. Doesn't really seem like an essay question that everyone should describe run of the mill issues with, given the way they have worded it.
  3. Also factor in what you would want to do following a PhD and post-doc. The chances of getting a faculty position are probably lower than the chances of getting into medicine, so setting realistic expectations what you might do post-PhD should also be considered.
  4. adhominem

    LOR Question

    U of A doesn't require LORs. From the application (emphasis added): Complete the section below with the names of your two referees. We suggest that you use people who presently know you well enough to provide a reference in an honest and thoughtful manner. Some suggestions for referees to consider are (in alphabetical order) coaches, co-workers, employers, leaders of volunteer organizations or clubs, professors, supervisors, research supervisors, and teachers. References from relatives, family members, friends, close family friends, or personal physicians will not be accepted. Referees may be contacted at any point during the application process; they will not be asked to provide a letter."
  5. adhominem

    Only writing CARS for Calgary

    I think it tells adcoms you're lazy and can't be bothered to study for and write the test in its entirety. If I were a file reviewer I would give you a subpar score for the global assessment of academic merit on that basis.
  6. adhominem

    Publications vs experience

    Publications are the thing that matters most when it comes to research. I would even argue staying in 1 or 2 would be better than 3, and only go to the second if you want another letter of reference. If you commit a long time to a single lab, you're likely to actually have something to show for it by the end.
  7. the ECs are probably only out of 16 now, since they have cut the separate awards section entirely. I would imagine the section is meant to explain extenuating circumstances contributing to performance which may appear lackluster at face value.
  8. Do you think it is realistic to assume that you can complete your thesis (which should theoretically be a full-time commitment on its own) while also completing 4 undergraduate courses per term? Considering your 3.5 cGPA when you presumably had more time to dedicate to your courses, I don't think this will go well for you. My advice would be to complete your thesis and then do your undergraduate courses the following year. Rushing and trying to cram it all in one year sounds like a recipe for a low GPA, meaning it would be a waste of your time and money.
  9. adhominem

    Paid activities in non employment section.

    People rejected post-interview also receive these scores. At this point though nobody knows how the scoring of ECs factors into the aggregate score and ranking of applicants for admission though.
  10. adhominem

    St. John Ambulance to Primary Care Paramedic

    If you have any major ski hills around, consider volunteering with the Canadian Ski Patrol. Its a great volunteer gig (free skiing and pro deals on equipment) and you get plenty of hands on trauma experience. My guess is that it would be more substantial experience than you could expect with SJA.
  11. adhominem

    Physician political orientation

    Yes, many young MD applicants are likely to be liberal. On top of that, there is no denying that academics (i.e. those who run medical schools and admissions committees) are far more left-leaning than the general public. The massive liberal bias within academia is well documented in several countries. I am quite convinced these circumstances lead to a selection bias for incoming students, though I am not aware of whether or not it has been documented. It is hard to imagine that a conservative influenced answer would be looked upon favorably by interviewers chosen by liberals when majority of the candidates are going to be delivering a more liberal answer. Oh yes, because an intelligent voter clearly would not have voted conservative... This sort of comment proves my point about liberal bias.
  12. adhominem

    PhD Friendly MD Schools

    UBC treats people with their PhD conferred at time of application as IP applicants (see here: http://mdprogram.med.ubc.ca/admissions/admission-requirements/) UofA is vague about how it will impact your score, but the website implies that you can get the additional points prior to actually defending (see https://www.ualberta.ca/medicine/programs/md/applying/academic-requirements): "Graduate Students- All applicants are subject to the same application requirements. Applicants who have obtained a Masters or PhD are eligible to receive additional points towards their rank score. For those nearing completion of their program who wish to have these points added to their score, please have your supervisor provide a letter as proof of successful completion once you have defended your thesis with no required revisions."
  13. adhominem

    How to research

    To be fair everyone, the OP did say they're writing case reports. Most of what you're discussing isn't even relevant to that kind of work.
  14. adhominem

    Paid activities in non employment section.

    The breakdown of how they score the ECs is as follows (or at least in the recent past... who knows, they might change it without telling us): Volunteerism- 4 pts Work Experience- 4 pts Awards & Scholarships- 1 pt (Your GPA heavily influences scholarships and is a scored criterion, so this section is worth less) Leadership- 4 pts Diversity of Experience- 4 pts TOTAL= 17 pts. You should strategically place your commitments within each category to obtain the highest score possible. Based on scores of 7-9ish being average for those obtaining an IP interview, you should assume that it is exceptional to obtain more than a 2 in any section. Based on that, you're probably better off splitting up your strongest entries into the separate sections and (possibly) obtaining scores of 1 and 2 instead of hypothetically earning a 3. However, keep in mind that you probably don't want to have what could be considered duplicate entries. If you list your job under employment and then again in the leadership section, you will probably not get any points for the second entry. When adcoms used to give feedback meetings, I was told this based on my entries where I had listed an NSERC/AIHS summer studentship award in both the scholarships and employment sections. They felt that constituted a duplicate entry and I was told both entries were not eligible to contribute to the score. Therefore, if you list your job in one category I don't think you will be able to list the leadership components of that job in a separate entry.