Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


adhominem last won the day on June 22 2017

adhominem had the most liked content!

About adhominem

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

1,089 profile views
  1. adhominem

    Paid activities in non employment section.

    People rejected post-interview also receive these scores. At this point though nobody knows how the scoring of ECs factors into the aggregate score and ranking of applicants for admission though.
  2. adhominem

    St. John Ambulance to Primary Care Paramedic

    If you have any major ski hills around, consider volunteering with the Canadian Ski Patrol. Its a great volunteer gig (free skiing and pro deals on equipment) and you get plenty of hands on trauma experience. My guess is that it would be more substantial experience than you could expect with SJA.
  3. adhominem

    Physician political orientation

    Yes, many young MD applicants are likely to be liberal. On top of that, there is no denying that academics (i.e. those who run medical schools and admissions committees) are far more left-leaning than the general public. The massive liberal bias within academia is well documented in several countries. I am quite convinced these circumstances lead to a selection bias for incoming students, though I am not aware of whether or not it has been documented. It is hard to imagine that a conservative influenced answer would be looked upon favorably by interviewers chosen by liberals when majority of the candidates are going to be delivering a more liberal answer. Oh yes, because an intelligent voter clearly would not have voted conservative... This sort of comment proves my point about liberal bias.
  4. adhominem

    PhD Friendly MD Schools

    UBC treats people with their PhD conferred at time of application as IP applicants (see here: http://mdprogram.med.ubc.ca/admissions/admission-requirements/) UofA is vague about how it will impact your score, but the website implies that you can get the additional points prior to actually defending (see https://www.ualberta.ca/medicine/programs/md/applying/academic-requirements): "Graduate Students- All applicants are subject to the same application requirements. Applicants who have obtained a Masters or PhD are eligible to receive additional points towards their rank score. For those nearing completion of their program who wish to have these points added to their score, please have your supervisor provide a letter as proof of successful completion once you have defended your thesis with no required revisions."
  5. adhominem

    How to research

    To be fair everyone, the OP did say they're writing case reports. Most of what you're discussing isn't even relevant to that kind of work.
  6. adhominem

    Paid activities in non employment section.

    The breakdown of how they score the ECs is as follows (or at least in the recent past... who knows, they might change it without telling us): Volunteerism- 4 pts Work Experience- 4 pts Awards & Scholarships- 1 pt (Your GPA heavily influences scholarships and is a scored criterion, so this section is worth less) Leadership- 4 pts Diversity of Experience- 4 pts TOTAL= 17 pts. You should strategically place your commitments within each category to obtain the highest score possible. Based on scores of 7-9ish being average for those obtaining an IP interview, you should assume that it is exceptional to obtain more than a 2 in any section. Based on that, you're probably better off splitting up your strongest entries into the separate sections and (possibly) obtaining scores of 1 and 2 instead of hypothetically earning a 3. However, keep in mind that you probably don't want to have what could be considered duplicate entries. If you list your job under employment and then again in the leadership section, you will probably not get any points for the second entry. When adcoms used to give feedback meetings, I was told this based on my entries where I had listed an NSERC/AIHS summer studentship award in both the scholarships and employment sections. They felt that constituted a duplicate entry and I was told both entries were not eligible to contribute to the score. Therefore, if you list your job in one category I don't think you will be able to list the leadership components of that job in a separate entry.
  7. adhominem

    Physician political orientation

    Having done several rounds of MMIs in Alberta I would definitely agree that there are questions which favor a left-leaning ideology. It is no secret that most academics are left-leaning, and admissions committees are undeniably going to leaning in that direction as well due to the biases of the individuals creating the questions and discussing what sort of 'problematic' (i.e. right wing) answers could arise.
  8. adhominem

    Retaking courses

    Depends on the school, you have to check what each schools policy is individually. U of A only looks at the first mark though, to get you started.
  9. In the past cycle they've already modified how they ranked people-- they have been clear about that. This is why they removed the information they used to have on the website regarding weighting (i.e. off the top of my head I think it used to be 30% ECs, 30% interview, 13% MCAT and 27% GPA). They have not disclosed how they assess applicants since the removal of that information (to my knowledge). Your friend getting in likely reflects a shift in the weighting formula, not necessarily the ending of GPA as a scored criteria.
  10. I think the best argument against having a ranked GPA assessment nowadays is that U of A has removed prerequisite requirements and allows people to take whatever they want. Without a relatively standardized path (i.e. everyone doing a degree with the same 'core' courses), its hard to say whether comparing those GPAs is truly meaningful. That being said, I would still like it to be assessed competitively, since I agree with a lot of silver_08's points.
  11. Given how they've introduced new policies (i.e. CASPer, panel interviews) in the past years without meaningful notification, I'm fairly certain it will be implemented without advanced notice.
  12. I've heard from some faculty members who are aware of adcoms policies that it will be instated this cycle, and if not then the next.
  13. You stated you're doing a full course load though- are you taking double the amount of classes you need for your minor for that sake of having a full load?
  14. That's sort of odd. You can do an entire second bachelor's degree in two years if you have your first degree in hand. Why would a minor take two additional years with a full course load?
  15. Course load per year for each of those years? Have you completed your degree (and minor) after the 5 years? Assuming you've calculated everything correctly, you have a shot at many of those schools after a 5th year and doing another for a slight increase (assuming another 4.0?) is probably not time or cost effective. GPA is just one component of admissions, and I'm sure you have more room for improvement elsewhere instead of doing another year of UG for the sake of improving GPA by 0.01-0.04 (and that is assuming a perfect GPA, which may not happen...).