Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums

IP status for Saskatchewan med new trend?


Recommended Posts

Hey everyone, a trend I noticed with many undergrad students I've chatted with is the new trend of moving to Saskatchewan for undergraduate, doing it there and getting IP and applying to medschool. I've been hearing about it and even know people who personally left to do undergraduate there, it's enough to put a question on my mind.  how viable of an option is this and what are the draw backs or limitations people don't realize about this strategy? From the way it's been described to me, it almost seems like a fool proof way of securing medical school in Canada.( For the record I'm from Ontario and know next to nothing about med in Saskatchewan or its admission process)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, YesIcan55 said:

Sask IP is by far the easiest place to get into med in Canada (looking at both acceptance rate % and average stats of those accepted compared to anywhere else)...and like you said you can go undergrad there and get IP status....it's actually a genius way to exponentially increase your chances of admission (by doing UG there)...I personally know a couple of people of did that and actually got into med after 2 years of undergrad (back when Sask allowed IP to apply after 2 years of UG a few years ago)...Sask does not consider ECs/volunteering/research etc and the average MCAT of accepted students was 501 in 2016..you can even look at the acceptance threads and /or stats released by Sask...there are people getting in with a 496 MCAT and 76% GPA which is jaw dropping when people from other schools don't get invites with much much higher stats...sad really.

I just find it strange that such a fool proof plan has no regulations, risks or limitations. Most people I know personally who do it leave the second they get a chance for residency. Correct me if I'm wrong but that draining of physicians from the Province can't be a good thing, I wonder if a ROS style method should be put into effect, or something similar to westerns SWOMEN bonus which requires all of highschool in the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/20/2019 at 10:33 AM, Pakoon said:

I just find it strange that such a fool proof plan has no regulations, risks or limitations. Most people I know personally who do it leave the second they get a chance for residency. Correct me if I'm wrong but that draining of physicians from the Province can't be a good thing, I wonder if a ROS style method should be put into effect, or something similar to westerns SWOMEN bonus which requires all of highschool in the area.

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 8/19/2019 at 11:48 PM, YesIcan55 said:

Sask IP is by far the easiest place to get into med in Canada (looking at both acceptance rate % and average stats of those accepted compared to anywhere else)...and like you said you can go undergrad there and get IP status....it's actually a genius way to exponentially increase your chances of admission (by doing UG there)...I personally know a couple of people of did that and actually got into med after 2 years of undergrad (back when Sask allowed IP to apply after 2 years of UG a few years ago)...Sask does not consider ECs/volunteering/research etc and the average MCAT of accepted students was 501 in 2016..you can even look at the acceptance threads and /or stats released by Sask...there are people getting in with a 496 MCAT and 76% GPA which is jaw dropping when people from other schools don't get invites with much much higher stats...sad really.

It's not the fact that someone with much higher stats doesn't deserve to get in. It's the fact that U of S values DIVERSITY. I know many people who were accepted into U of S with a 80% average and around a 23rd percentile MCAT and they will be amazing physicians. Marks are not the deciding factor of wether or not they will be a great physician. I find this post of yours very discourteous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BarbellsAndBicarb said:

It's not the fact that someone with much higher stats doesn't deserve to get in. It's the fact that U of S values DIVERSITY. I know many people who were accepted into U of S with a 80% average and around a 23rd percentile MCAT and they will be amazing physicians. Marks are not the deciding factor of wether or not they will be a great physician. I find this post of yours very discourteous. 

Correct me if I am wrong, but U of S doesn't look at extracirriculars or experinces to my knowledge. If this is the case, than how can it be argued that they value diversity?

IMO the MMI cannot thoroughly select for diverse applicants or those with unique experinces on its own.The only thing I could see in regards to them valuing diversity would be having seats for rural and indigenous applicants, but I am personally unaware of how many seats they reserve for each of those. I understand the need to keep physicians within Sask, and obviously if you train someone born in Sask they are more likely to practice there.

With all that being said, I don't think it is fair to say that a value on diversity explains the relatively low stats for IP matriculants. Evidence points to the source of this being lower amounts of competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2019 at 10:31 PM, BarbellsAndBicarb said:

It's not the fact that someone with much higher stats doesn't deserve to get in. It's the fact that U of S values DIVERSITY. I know many people who were accepted into U of S with a 80% average and around a 23rd percentile MCAT and they will be amazing physicians. Marks are not the deciding factor of wether or not they will be a great physician. I find this post of yours very discourteous. 

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, YesIcan55 said:

I know many people with high GPA's, high MCAT's, great EC's who have done multiple degrees and have been applying to Canadian medical schools 4+ times and have yet to get accepted. These people will make amazing physicians but are being shut out by the system every year. And you're telling me that someone with a low GPA, very low MCAT, and no need to demonstrate EC's in the application process, who can waltz into UofS on their first try, will be an amazing physician....that is enraging. Plus, as the poster above said if you don't even consider EC's / work experience /etc you can't give me the diversity excuse...

You're absolutely correct, U of S doesn't care about work experience or EC's. But you really think that they would accept someone into their medical school if they weren't able to communicate properly with an individual to pass the interview? You do know that the interview is 50% of admission? Sure, there are applicants with outstanding grades but they do a piss poor job with communication. I first hand have had experience with residents and physicians who can't communicate properly with their colleagues and patients which leads to a nurse/paramedic running their ER for them. 

You do know that diversity isn't necessarily EC's? If you guys would go a little more in-depth in research about this particular medical school you would know that they have seats specifically for those who come from a lower household income. Who have had more barriers in their way of being able to achieve high grades. 

They offer 5 seats for DSAAP and 6 for Aboriginal applicants I believe. Also, if you were to go more looking into their acceptance rates. In 2018, there was only 2 people accepted with a 75-80 average. The median was an 84-86%. 

I'm not saying that high stat applicants shouldn't not be accepted; but I'm saying have some decency for other applicants who may not have had it as easy as others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2019 at 12:39 PM, BarbellsAndBicarb said:

You're absolutely correct, U of S doesn't care about work experience or EC's. But you really think that they would accept someone into their medical school if they weren't able to communicate properly with an individual to pass the interview? You do know that the interview is 50% of admission? Sure, there are applicants with outstanding grades but they do a piss poor job with communication. I first hand have had experience with residents and physicians who can't communicate properly with their colleagues and patients which leads to a nurse/paramedic running their ER for them. 

You do know that diversity isn't necessarily EC's? If you guys would go a little more in-depth in research about this particular medical school you would know that they have seats specifically for those who come from a lower household income. Who have had more barriers in their way of being able to achieve high grades. 

They offer 5 seats for DSAAP and 6 for Aboriginal applicants I believe. Also, if you were to go more looking into their acceptance rates. In 2018, there was only 2 people accepted with a 75-80 average. The median was an 84-86%. 

I'm not saying that high stat applicants shouldn't not be accepted; but I'm saying have some decency for other applicants who may not have had it as easy as others.

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2019 at 11:19 PM, YesIcan55 said:

I know many people with high GPA's, high MCAT's, great EC's who have done multiple degrees and have been applying to Canadian medical schools 4+ times and have yet to get accepted. These people will make amazing physicians but are being shut out by the system every year. And you're telling me that someone with a low GPA, very low MCAT, and no need to demonstrate EC's in the application process, who can waltz into UofS on their first try, will be an amazing physician....that is enraging. Plus, as the poster above said if you don't even consider EC's / work experience /etc you can't give me the diversity excuse...

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, alextrebek said:

I know this is an aside from the point of this thread, but worth responding to- I have to agree with BarbellsAndBicarb. I had a low(er) MCAT. I was also working a full time job so I could pay for rent and groceries the whole summer I studied for it. I know this won't make me a less qualified physician than my colleague with the higher score because they had parents to pay for a summer of MCAT prep courses and four months off to study. I'm not better than them, they're not better than me. Just different life circumstances. Past a certain GPA/MCAT cut-off, there's a real argument to be made that the rest of what many attribute to 'worth' actually comes down to money. I see what you mean about the ECs, though, and anticipate based on recent shifts that this could change substantially in coming years. 

There's increasingly an understanding that after a certain cutoff, which is lower than what most schools have as their cutoffs currently, your GPA and MCAT score are basically meaningless in predicting your competence as a physician. The last numbers I read I think were something like a 3.0 GPA and a 504 MCAT. 

 

Personally I think we have a massive socioeconomic divide in medicine which thankfully schools are starting to address. In society the top 1% represent, well 1% of the population, but in medicine, atleast in my year they represent over 65% of the class. I have some ideas about how admissions should work, and have had some conversations with faculty members in my school, but I think this is the number 1 thing we have to address, not superficial aspects like MCAT or GPA. So much of being a good physician is having the ability to connect with and care about your patients, and I just think that's really hard to do when there is such a large social gap between medicine and the rest of society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2019 at 9:08 PM, JBDF said:

I’d love to hear from an Ontarian who went to U of S for undergrad to gain IP status for med school.  How was your experience?  Did you like U of S?  Would you recommend this path?  How hard is it to do well there?

Honestly me too... Currently USask is my top choice because it'll allow me to get IP status but I don't want to go all the way out to Saskatoon for no reason... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I'll start by saying that I agree with Barbells' comments. In addition to those points, something to keep in mind is that admissions requirements are always fluid. For example, CASPER was added to this years admission without a great deal of warning. While something as small as the CASPER is not a significant determinant on where you want to do your undergrad, the point is that Usask could change their admission requirements at any time in a way that may have implications on getting accepted. Therefore, perhaps you should do your undergrad where it is best for you at this time, really focus on what your priories are (perhaps they won't even be medicine 4 years down the road), and put yourself in a position to be able to apply to multiple medical schools. Obviously it is easier said than done to be able to apply as an out of province applicant, but it seems drastic to move to a new province just to do an undergrad. Just a thought to consider, as it would be a shame to go to those lengths only to have your eligibility revoked when you are ready to apply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/8/2020 at 3:02 PM, sam.03 said:

So should I apply to an USask undergrad program to have the best chance of getting into med school because I am in grade 12.

heck, if you're willing to take such drastic measures to get into med, why not move to Quebec, learn basic French, and do your CEGEP in English over there (CEGEP = Quebec's equivalent of college, which is much cheaper, easier and shorter than undergrad, and only takes 2 years)... it's much easier to get in med from CEGEP as there's really not a lot of competition (normally 50-55% of interviewed applicants get accepted), the process is MUCH more straightforward – ECs only count for 10% pre-interview at one school (McGill), and don't count at all at the 3 other French ones, no personal statement, no essays, no letter of recommendations (so not having to struggle school and ECs at the same time), only grades + CASPer + MMIs are taken into account, etc. The only downside is that you must get your French up to par if you wanna apply at the 3 other French med schools other than McGill, as the MMIs at the French schools will only be in French...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...