1218kat Posted May 21, 2020 Report Share Posted May 21, 2020 Hey guys, Anyone a Masters applicant with a wGPA in the high 3.8s or low 3.9s and decent ECs successful at U of T? Or know of anyone? I am in that range and not sure how to feel because its definitely not a hopeless wGPA but the 3.96 average is giving me anxiety. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydoo1623 Posted May 28, 2020 Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 On 5/21/2020 at 4:53 AM, 1218kat said: Hey guys, Anyone a Masters applicant with a wGPA in the high 3.8s or low 3.9s and decent ECs successful at U of T? Or know of anyone? I am in that range and not sure how to feel because its definitely not a hopeless wGPA but the 3.96 average is giving me anxiety. I think that's more than a competitive wGPA. But not sure how much wGPA is weighted when you're a grad applicant. An insider told me it matters less, they care about how you're going to use that masters in medicine, which is extrapolated from your research productivity during your program. Apparently they'd take someone with a lower wGPA but more compelling productivity metrics over someone with a high wGPA and less productivity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drager Posted May 28, 2020 Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 46 minutes ago, scoobydoo1623 said: I think that's more than a competitive wGPA. But not sure how much wGPA is weighted when you're a grad applicant. An insider told me it matters less, they care about how you're going to use that masters in medicine, which is extrapolated from your research productivity during your program. Apparently they'd take someone with a lower wGPA but more compelling productivity metrics over someone with a high wGPA and less productivity. How would they measure productivity with a course-based masters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFlyGuy Posted May 29, 2020 Report Share Posted May 29, 2020 As of this past cycle U of T simplified their grad applicant system, such that no academic CV is required to judge productivity anymore, and instead you get credit based on which of the categories below you fall into. My understanding is that it's judged equally within each category regarding the grad applicant credit specifically, but how you talk about your research activities in the ABS & essays, what your research-based references say in the LOR/CAF, etc, can have additional impact elsewhere in the application, as U of T tends to value research. From the U of T admissions website: "Graduate applicants will receive credit for their graduate work based on the following categories: Doctoral degree conferred Doctoral degree in progress Research-based Master’s conferred Research-based Master’s in progress Course-based Master’s conferred" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.