Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About arkragon

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Interests

Recent Profile Visitors

846 profile views
  1. I remember cell bio being acceptable but that was in 2018. Not sure how it is now.
  2. Haha if you get into UofT you'll hear a bit about it in the first year public health course.
  3. Don't just rely on my word though hahaha. I think you have an idea of how much studying you need. If you feel like you need the resources then it might be best to not rely on just one, but if you feel confident with one resource then go for it. Good luck!
  4. I've never used datcrusher but I've used only the Kaplan book and the CDA kit for myself and it seemed to be sufficient. So I think it's possible to use one resource if it's good. I did hear datcrusher was good too so it's possible.
  5. I'm sorry to hear that. Just do your best for second and third year and nail the DAT and you should be good. I'm no expert though but I think you still have a good chance.
  6. I procrastinated pretty hard when it came to my immunizations. I wasn't even waitlisted either. I assumed I had all my immunities but I was wrong. I got the first two hep b shots just before any clinical work so that was pretty clutch. Don't be like me lol. They do try to organize make up times if you are delayed but it's best to avoid that.
  7. Lines have been okay at UofT. Sometimes you just wait but it's actually okay not too bad and there aren't many lines. The only line that was annoying was for the fume hood. I just left the lab when I knew I was at the end of the line. Note that this was only for first year. I don't know how the other years are going to be.
  8. Yep, out of 30. Aim for 21 across the board for a decent chance.
  9. Uoft drops your worst year I think as long as it isn't your last year of studies in a 4-year program. You can look up their admissions page for more details. I'm not sure about the other schools (too lazy to check) but I'm sure you can look up their admissions requirements to see what they require. I think it is possible with a music major, but I'm not sure how the grading works in the music program. If they never give out 4.0s, or at least 3.7-3.8s, no matter how hard you try then that could work against you despite the uniqueness aspect. If you're planning on doing more than 4 years of
  10. It depends on how much experience you have with the material. If you're familiar with the topics and have experience with writing these sorts of tests (e.g. MCAT, OAT, etc.) then it'll take less than 2 months to study. Otherwise it may still take 2 months (depending on how intense you study) or more. Some people take 4 months (a whole summer) or more or less. It's best to gauge this yourself by looking at what you need to know. You can check the DAT website for the list of topics you need to cover and/or visit your local bookstore for a DAT book and estimate it yourself. TL;dr - depe
  11. Yeah, I've been thinking along those similar lines. It's quite odd that ALL 1000+ test takers underperformed at biology and PAT (not even 1/1000 could do well?). Very likely, it's the test itself that's harder, but CDA says it's the test writers who underperformed, so dunno.
  12. If I'm wrong then that's great! I wouldn't have to worry anymore, aside from the uselessness of the section and how it can be used to weed people out while being unreliable in predicting clinical ability.
  13. If that's the case then I really wonder why McGill would even include MDT at all, especially if it's solely used as a cutoff. MDT is optional for almost all schools and they could simply follow suit. "They touched the soap, so they pass." Really? And going back to my previous point, technical skills are crucial for a practicing dentist. I don't want to just tell people that they can't be a dentist, but sometimes that's just the hard truth. Dentistry is expensive, and practicing for months but still getting the lowest possible score will only spell trouble for the next 4 years or more
  14. Lowering the sciences score requirement would make more sense, but MDT from 6 to 5? I don't see how that would make any sense. Like Starburst said, a 5 is like just touching the soap. And not to sound harsh, but if you actually want/need the MDT requirement to go from 6 to 5 I don't think dentistry is really the best career to choose.
  15. Here is the Feb 2017 English Score Scale. I hope this helps in some way.
  • Create New...