1234561234

Result: Rejected Timestamp: 8:48am cGPA: 3.96 CARS: 130 CASPer: Felt it went alright, but I don't think it was used as I was a guaranteed interview from last year. MMI interview thoughts: I thought the MMI went alright, and definitely bombed a station or two. Guess it went worse than I thought. Year: MSc last year Geography: IP Guaranteed interview from last year: Yes

Time Stamp: 9:34 am ET Accepted/WL/R: Bad WL IP/OOP: IP SWOMEN (Y/N): N 2YGPA: 3.96 MCAT (CP/CARS/BB): 128/130/130/131 Interview Experience: Felt like it didn't go too well, so this is to be expected

Result: Rejected Timestamp: 9:59 AM wGPA/cGPA: 3.97/3.96 MCAT: 519 ECs: Diverse and long term Essays: Felt good about them and made them personal. Similar quality to last year. Interview: Felt that I gave decent to good answers to the questions. Pretty crushed as these felt better than last year (where I was waitlisted). Guess it just goes to show how inaccurate self-evals are. U of T was my top choice, and it sucks to have done worse this cycle Year: MSc final year Geography: IP

You should be safe! I was WL on Western Student Center so it should be accurate. Congrats!

Same here. Either way, we will know in ~3 hours

With you on that one

Yeah I have the "Response" column as well. I was waitlisted last year and WL/R info was not shown on OMSAS (only communicated via email). I can't remember if I had this column last year, or this cycle before today, but I wouldn't read into it too much as it seems everyone who has posted so far has it.

I have not gotten that email yet either, but I assume it will be sent tomorrow

TIME STAMP: 9:42AM Result: Inv GPA: 3.96 MCAT: Above cutoff ECs: Varied and diverse Essays: Felt good, spent 1 month Year: MSc final year

Time Stamp: 2:26 Invite/reject: Invite IP/OOP: !P SWOMEN (Y/N): N 2YGPA: 3.97 MCAT (CHEM/CARS/BIO/PSYCH): 128/130/130/131 Essays (X/8): 8

Last year I got an email confirming receipt of the form

The other dates are March 7 and 21, so I would imagine you can expect to hear back around 2 weeks (or more) before those dates.

I didn't get an invite yet. However, last year, I got my invite in March, and this is only the first round of offers, so we will likely hear back later.

I dropped from around 40th to 0-25, even though I had a few more activities and increased duration of activities, with almost identical descriptions. However, that seems like a big drop.

I had a 92.somth and a 25th to 50th percentile ec last year and I was about 1/3 of the way past the ip cutoff toward the oop line last year, in case that helps for reference? Idk if the pool is more competitive this year

I would also be interested!

Does anyone know if the class is full yet/has anyone been rejected off of the waitlist yet? Still haven't heard anything back

Idk but my time was 10:29:5X and I didnt get offer

I heard from a friend someone they know got off WL already but not confirmed

Does anybody think they might evaluate references? It is more objective than ABS, everyone will have needed it, and it could assess many of the traits they might look for interviews. I know that it has just been used for checks and balances before but would it not be the best thing to look at if they go beyond just CARS/GPA/CASPer? Especially since looking at other sections of the MCAT when they have GPA seems redundant.

Touche

That makes sense and I think that your weighting system is most fair for all applicants. I think that if any score is uniformly weighed too much more than the others , many people would be disadvantaged as there is no perfect substitute for an interview. At least this way doing poorly on one section won't disqualify you.

Does anyone think they will consider references or ABS as part of the marking scheme?