Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums

silverlinden

Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About silverlinden

  • Rank
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Has anyone still not heard from their verifiers? My first verifier was contacted on Nov 5th last cycle, so perhaps the 1 month difference in submission deadline this year (Oct 1 vs. Sep 1) means that some applications will have their verifiers contacted later than usual. @sciencegirl314 you seem to pass the cutoffs for OOP (I know I do as well), so it should be fine. It would be nice to get notified though! In any case, I will post when (or if) I hear back.
  2. Yes, but you have to be in the final year of a research-based Master's program.
  3. Hi there, According to the admissions website, a GPA of 3.7 is considered competitive for applicants in the graduate pool. If you're in a research-based masters, you should qualify as a graduate student. Strong EC's would also definitely improve your chances at interview.
  4. That's great to hear! Was there a large difference between your first and second degree gpa in terms of being competitive for you applicant pool?
  5. Hello everyone, I was wondering if anyone received (or know someone who received) an interview on the basis of a 2nd undergraduate degree? I know we can't know for sure since admissions doesn't reveal this information, but it would be great to know if anyone received an interview with a competitive 2nd degree gpa and a noncompetitive 1st degree gpa. The gpa for my second degree is substantially higher than my first and I was going to outline the reasons for this in the academic explanations essay. Thank you!
  6. Hi everyone, I hope you are all keeping safe during these difficult times. I applied to UBC last year as an OOP and was quite close to the interview cutoff. There were quite a few things a couldn't put in my NAQ section last cycle due to the June 6 deadline. These include awards, conference presentations, and publications. I also feel as though my NAQ section could have been written - focussing more on reflection on the activity than the description itself. I was wondering if anyone who was successful in attaining an interview may be willing to review my NAQ section for thi
×
×
  • Create New...