medisforme Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 so i was looking at the bell curve scores for MCAT writers, and about 2% of people score around a 1 in each section. Wouldn't you basically have to try to get a score that bad (or else I guess some people have absolutely no idea what they are getting into when they go to write the exam). I guess I just can't believe that some people who want to do medicine would do that bad or not take the time to prepare for the test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
register Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 It's a curved test, so if someone gets 15 on a section, another person somewhere must get the lowest score of 1 on that section to balance it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamer Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Take into account anyone can write the MCAT. I've known people who challenged it for fun without studying to see how they'd do. In addition, there's probably people who think they did terribly in a couple passages so they just intentionally select a random answer for the rest of the test/don't even try answering at all. I'd say more people who got 1's were in either of these 2 categories than people who legitimately tried and bombed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhoenixFlare500 Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Maybe those people can't read very well, or English isn't even their first language. There's always gotta be somebody at the bottom of the curve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan0105 Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Errr, emphasis on the bell curve again. If one looked at the test on a percentage of questions right, it could be that the best person got 49/52 and the worst person got 42/52. That worst mark is still 80% but since it is a bell curve and no one did worse than them, they end up with a 1. So, it totally blows for them, but it more accurately shows that they were in fact the worst person. (There's a lot more to it since the AAMC also puts in formulas and questions to compare between different versions, years, etc but that's basically it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alastriss Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Errr, emphasis on the bell curve again. If one looked at the test on a percentage of questions right, it could be that the best person got 49/52 and the worst person got 42/52. That worst mark is still 80% but since it is a bell curve and no one did worse than them, they end up with a 1. So, it totally blows for them, but it more accurately shows that they were in fact the worst person. (There's a lot more to it since the AAMC also puts in formulas and questions to compare between different versions, years, etc but that's basically it) You are very very correct in theory but we are demanding a more practical solution, because we know that the raw score - scaled score conversions require you to have as low as around 15% on the test to get 1-2. So while you are right, it never has happened that the lowest mark was 75% or 80% and I think the OP is wondering why that lower threshold is SOO low Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tan008 Posted April 13, 2008 Report Share Posted April 13, 2008 register is right. Because it is a normal distribution scale the lowest threshold will correspond to the highest hence, there are those who will get a score as low as 1 to counterbalance all those who get a score of 14-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.