Angela Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 SO recently I got my score and it as a 31O (PS10/VR10/BS11/WSO), before that, 29P (PS9/VR9/BS11/WSP). With Queen's more recently haveing higher WS cutoffs, this likely means I would need to re-write, but anyone have suggestions on how to get this Q/R? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HBP Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 You should ask in the MCAT forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChicoMaki Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 historically, the past four years have been: Q, Q, R, Q(most recent). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angela Posted September 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 So basically the concensus is that I have to plan to rewrite because of WS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~me~ Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 So basically the concensus is that I have to plan to rewrite because of WS? And potentially your VR as well. Based on last year's cut-offs, a 9 might not get you an interview at Western or Queens. I think your score is fine for UofT though, which uses the MCAT as a "flag" Good luck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sv3 Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 And potentially your VR as well. Based on last year's cut-offs, a 9 might not get you an interview at Western or Queens. I think your score is fine for UofT though, which uses the MCAT as a "flag" Good luck! nah she had a 10 on her recent VR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hkmedic Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Just curious, how do you guys know the cut-offs for every year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~me~ Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 nah she had a 10 on her recent VR Oops, I'm sorry I only saw the 29P .... time for new glasses! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supafield Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Just curious, how do you guys know the cut-offs for every year? In the past they posted them... the last 2 years people have deduced them from tonnes of posts on who did and didn't get an interview. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hkmedic Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 In the past they posted them...the last 2 years people have deduced them from tonnes of posts on who did and didn't get an interview. Ah, I see! Those are pretty high cut-offs, R especially. @@ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angela Posted September 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 So basically the WS is going to make it that I have to rewrite yet again to make it for Queen's unless by a miracle they lower the WS cutoff this year to that of 2005's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HBP Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 So basically the WS is going to make it that I have to rewrite yet again to make it for Queen's unless by a miracle they lower the WS cutoff this year to that of 2005's? And Western. This miracle won't happen, most people expect them to go up rather than down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rburgundy Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 And Western. This miracle won't happen, most people expect them to go up rather than down. Who expects the WS to go up? I was under the impression the R was an aberration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supafield Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Who expects the WS to go up? I was under the impression the R was an aberration. No one knows what they're thinking in that office. I would guess a Q again..... but maybe someone has a new idea and they will only take people with M's because that's the first letter in medicine lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sv3 Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 No one knows what they're thinking in that office. I would guess a Q again..... but maybe someone has a new idea and they will only take people with M's because that's the first letter in medicine lol. if you think you have a shot just apply. I swear we need a sticky with just those 9 words!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micro Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Who expects the WS to go up? I was under the impression the R was an aberration. Yeah WS=R was a ridiculous cut-off. I mean that's in like the 85-95th percentile or something close to that. There is no way that could be raised above R, there probably wouldn't be a large enough pool if the WS cutoff was exceeding the 95th percentile! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderpig Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Yeah WS=R was a ridiculous cut-off. I mean that's in like the 85-95th percentile or something close to that. There is no way that could be raised above R, there probably wouldn't be a large enough pool if the WS cutoff was exceeding the 95th percentile! I think that the problem with the WS scores is that they're not scaled. Whereas all the other parts of the MCAT are scaled scores, ensuring the the top X percentile will make the cut-offs, the writing samples are assigned scores based on their own merits. This is because people grade them individually. What I'm trying to say is, the WS will be given a score that it deserves, not based on how it compares to all the other students' WS. This means that in any given year, it is possible to have a large pool of applicants with excellent WS scores, thus making the need for a higher cut-off. I pray that this won't happen this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micro Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 I think that the problem with the WS scores is that they're not scaled. Whereas all the other parts of the MCAT are scaled scores, ensuring the the top X percentile will make the cut-offs, the writing samples are assigned scores based on their own merits. This is because people grade them individually. What I'm trying to say is, the WS will be given a score that it deserves, not based on how it compares to all the other students' WS. This means that in any given year, it is possible to have a large pool of applicants with excellent WS scores, thus making the need for a higher cut-off. I pray that this won't happen this year. Very true. Although I do remember reading the 2008 MCAT stats and it suggested that a WS=Q was equal to the 75th percentile. Approximately 15% of all test takers score WS=R or better, whereas if you include WS=Q then that percentage jumps to >33%. When it's put that way, WS=R doesn't seem like that strict a cut-off. I mean less than 33% of test takers score VR>=10, yet VR=10 is a cut-off at UWO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star1234 Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Very true. Although I do remember reading the 2008 MCAT stats and it suggested that a WS=Q was equal to the 75th percentile. Approximately 15% of all test takers score WS=R or better, whereas if you include WS=Q then that percentage jumps to >33%. When it's put that way, WS=R doesn't seem like that strict a cut-off. I mean less than 33% of test takers score VR>=10, yet VR=10 is a cut-off at UWO. Ya, but how many of those people have an R for the WS AND VR=10? I'd bet not that many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micro Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Ya, but how many of those people have an R for the WS AND VR=10? I'd bet not that many. Yeah good point. It tailors the applicant pool significantly. Although I'd think there would be some correlation between an applicant's WS and VR scores. ...Oh wait, the MCAT means nothing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HBP Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Who expects the WS to go up? I was under the impression the R was an aberration. Sorry, I should explain. If anything, one would expect an increase than a decrease. I concur that it will be a Q this year, simply bc I'm aplying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micro Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Sorry, I should explain. If anything, one would expect an increase than a decrease. I concur that it will be a Q this year, simply bc I'm aplying. I think you got your first sentence reversed! You expect a decrease, rather than an increase, correct? Since it appeared to be a WS=Q cut-off last cycle, it's fair to think that it may remain the same, but I wouldn't rule out WS=R. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w301088563 Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 It seems like its prob a Q based on last 4 years trend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micro Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 It seems like its prob a Q based on last 4 years trend. Wasn't it WS=R two application cycles ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmorelan Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Wasn't it WS=R two application cycles ago? Yes it was - the only time it has ever been that high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.