skp1187 Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Hey guys, what do you think? http://gizmodo.com/5520164/this-is-apples-next-iphone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deeman101 Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Hey guys, what do you think? http://gizmodo.com/5520164/this-is-apples-next-iphone HAHAHA! I was JUST looking at that same site. Funny how they disabled commenting in anticipation of the traffic. I hate apple with a passion but I gotta admit that phone looks pretty sweet. Still not as good as android though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leon Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Yeah, I don't like Apple too but this looks good. It will probably miss critical features that they will include in "later versions." Btw, that thing's not official yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UTPEOPLE Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Yeah, I don't like Apple too but this looks good. It will probably miss critical features that they will include in "later versions." Btw, that thing's not official yet. I want it.... any chance it will be compatible with WIND? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deeman101 Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 I want it.... any chance it will be compatible with WIND? Only if they make a T-mobile version in the US. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skp1187 Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Only if they make a T-mobile version in the US. I think you mean Verizon, both ATAT and T-mobile operate via GSM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deeman101 Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 I think you mean Verizon, both ATAT and T-mobile operate via GSM Yea but WIND operates at the same broadcast spectrum as T-mobile. So if they build a phone for the spectrum that T-mobile operates on, WIND users are in luck. GSM/CDMA has nothing to do with the MHz the phone operates on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrnursing Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 I want that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trymeover Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 I want that. Vince Vaughn is a-okay with the iPhone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UTPEOPLE Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Yea but WIND operates at the same broadcast spectrum as T-mobile. So if they build a phone for the spectrum that T-mobile operates on, WIND users are in luck. GSM/CDMA has nothing to do with the MHz the phone operates on. i cant remember where, but i remember reading rumours that apple put in an order for chips that handles the 1850/1950 bandwidth (forget which one is the important one) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leon Posted April 20, 2010 Report Share Posted April 20, 2010 More info out: Various reports are indicating that Gizmodo paid $5,000 (plus a bonus for traffic) or $10,000 for the next-generation iPhone previewed on Monday, depending on the source. Gawker Media founder Nick Denton clarified the pricetag last night here on Twitter, saying that the company paid the lower fee and that "we'll do anything for a story." Either way, Gizmodo racked in over 15 million page views by the end of the day, and may have damaged its relationship with Apple in the process. The device came into Gizmodo's possession thanks to Apple Software Engineer Gray Powell. On March 18, 2010, Powell celebrated his 27th birthday at the Gourmet Haus Straudt in Redwood City, California. Overdosed on good German beer, he left the device behind, concealed in a special iPhone 3GS case. Someone discovered the device, contacted Gizmodo after supposed failed attempts with Apple, and the rest is history. Now Apple is contacting Gizmodo via phone calls and this letter from Apple Senior Vice President & General Counsel Bruce Sewell, demanding that Gizmodo editorial director Brian Lam make arrangements for the device to be returned. Under California law, Apple has the right to reclaim the device up to three years--the person who found Apple's property "has the duty to report it." With that said, Apple has now blown any chances of denying that the device previewed on Gizmodo was not the real deal. There's also a question as to the device's current stature: is it lost or stolen? Gizmodo's lengthy explanation of how it came into possession of the iPhone 4G paints a "oh look what this guy found" scenario. Daring Fireball's John Gruber reports a different view on the scenario, claiming that Apple considers the unit stolen, not lost. Could it be that the party responsible for selling the device to Gizmodo may have actually swiped it from Powell? Maybe Powell himself stole the device from Apple and received partial payment from the mystery seller? Something doesn't seem right, and we're betting we'll see more from Apple's legal department within the next few days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMmd Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 i think it kinda looks like the zune hd... apple copying microsoft??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.