Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums

A List of Science Books to Read


Recommended Posts

When I say "Science Books", I mean the books can be both popular accounts of scientific fields or books that teach the science to students. Here goes:

 

  • The Grammar of Science by Karl Pearson
  • On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin
  • What is Life? by Erwin Schrodinger
  • Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica by Isaac Newton
  • Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook by Jerome Engel, Jr. and Timothy A. Pedley

 

Feel free to contribute. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favourites (my babies...they live here next to the computer):

 

Broca's Brain by Carl Sagan. (Spelling)

 

The Universe in a Nutshell by Stephen Hawking.

 

On the Shoulders of Giants by Stephen Hawking.

 

Transit of Venus by Peter Aughton.

 

A Brief History of Time...Stephen Hawking.

 

Cosmos by Carl Sagan.

 

Can anyone guess my hobby?

 

I have other favourites too--more about politics & social issues though: Race Against Time (Stephen Lewis), The Peculiar Institution, & Nicomachean Ethics (Aristotle).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Behe is contentious as he thinks random mutations don't occur at all. But yeah, I guess he counts as a read, too

 

Kenneth R. Miller's "Finding Darwin's God" is way better if you're looking for science and religion lit. Lets focus on the science here, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution - Michael J. Behe (an interesting read, even if I don't agree with the author's conclusions)

 

Michael Behe is rather

.

 

edit: That is to say, Behe's notion of irreducible complexity has been pretty thoroughly debunked. Behe is an opponent of science and only wants to infiltrate god and Christianity into highschool curriculum. He says things that are flat-out lies, and the Dover, PA trial (elaborated on in the second video I linked to) demonstrated really well just how untenable his claims regarding intelligent design are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Behe is rather
.

 

edit: That is to say, Behe's notion of irreducible complexity has been pretty thoroughly debunked. Behe is an opponent of science and only wants to infiltrate god and Christianity into highschool curriculum. He says things that are flat-out lies, and the Dover, PA trial (elaborated on in the second video I linked to) demonstrated really well just how untenable his claims regarding intelligent design are.

 

I said I didn't agree with his conclusions! Of course it is bunk. But I did find the book an interesting read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sagan – Demon-Haunted World (my favourite. I have probably read it 10 times)

 

For medicine Goldacre’s Bad Science and Singh’s Trick or Treatment are both essential in my opinion (but the former is difficult to obtain in North America for some reason unknown to me).

 

For evolution: Coyne – Why Evolution is True.

 

Dawkins – Everything.

 

Prothero – Evolution: What the fossils say and why it matters. Amazing.

 

Lane – Life Ascending: The Ten Great Inventions of Evolution (evolution from the perspective of a biochemist. Also “oxygen” and “power, sex, suicide”)

 

Ridley – The Red Queen, Genome, Origins of virtue

 

Spector – Denialism (about irrational thinking – Tavris’ Mistakes Were Made But Not By Me; Gardner’s The Science of Fear and Manjoo’s True Enough are also very good along the same lines.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Elegant Universe - Brian Greene

 

Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution - Michael J. Behe (an interesting read, even if I don't agree with the author's conclusions)

 

and less "sciency" but still good:

 

Guns, Germs and Steel - Jared Diamond

 

Collapse -Jared Diamond

 

I recommend Brian Greene's books to everyone, science background or not, he has a way of conveying both the simple and the previously unimaginable, in a gripping way, to people with and without physics backgrounds. Awesome.

 

I'd add:

 

Most of Dawkin's writing, particularly his earlier stuff. (before he started explaining how a monkey didn't give birth to a human and why this fact doesn't invalidate evolution)

 

I am a strange loop by Douglas Hofstadter, the follow up to Godel Escher and Bach.

 

More when I can get home and peruse the ol' bookshelf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll contribute by pretending history is a science and recommending The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, by William L. Shirer. I read the entire thing back when the power went out however-many years ago and it was really eye-opening. Learning about the inner-workings of Nazi Germany before and during WW2 is fascinating, in particular when so many misapprehensions exist about the topic ("the Nazis wanted to rule the world", etc).

 

Team of Rivals, by Dorris Kearns Goodwin is also really good. Everyone knows Abraham Lincoln, but how much do you really know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...