Jarven Posted July 15, 2012 Report Share Posted July 15, 2012 Pretty self explanatory; I'll be choosing my courses in about a week and I was wondering which course would be better. I'm doing a Pathobiology specialist and I'm wondering what would be better suited. I heard HMB265 is easier but you learn more in BIO260; The impression I get from students is that its really a debate of "High marks VS Learning". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArchEnemy Posted July 15, 2012 Report Share Posted July 15, 2012 I felt BIO260 was a fair course. As long as you put in the time (like you do for bio130), this course is very doable. In additional, the knowledge you gain in this course will likely be of relevance to upper year LMP courses. No idea about HMB265. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Singh Posted July 15, 2012 Report Share Posted July 15, 2012 HMB265 was a pretty bird course from what I remember, our average was high and most people I know did very well. It'll be easier (I think) to score higher in 265, but you'll probably learn more in 260. I'd take 265 over 260 any day still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMarauder Posted July 15, 2012 Report Share Posted July 15, 2012 UTHub would be a better place to ask this question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.