Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums

Are you single?

GunnersGunnaGun

By GunnersGunnaGun
in The Lounge

Are you single?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Are you single?

    • Yes
      29
    • No
      22

Recommended Posts

medigeek Rookie

medigeek

Posted
Posted

Interesting how many non single people there are on here.

 

I definitely think relationship > being single.

 

To those who say you can do whatever you like being single (hear it a lot), maybe with your right hand and the occasional random drunk chick if you're attractive and lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
axialpac Newbie

axialpac

Posted
Posted
V-day is the same day as every other day of the year....

 

 

It'd be interesting to see how many people in med school are actually single or in a relationship. Guess I should've been more specific...

 

-GGG

You can say that about any other holiday--in that case, they're all pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
apache Newbie

apache

Posted
Posted

actually, i never have time for a lot of ridiculously great relationships, how many times can a girl break up her bf she doesnt like and me end up being to busy... its a ****ed trade off, ive been told by so many people at the top of what they do that i have the capacity and characteristics to cause a change which benefits the entire population, on the other hand... there's the other half of me thats been so connected with someone that we spend 12, 14, 16 hours a day together, skip classes to go together, and this lasted years... thats why i slept 3 hrs a nite for a long long time, someone that amazing, but the most severe of borderlines and you're the only one that breaks the need for trust, inability to trust dynamic that underlies the erratic behavior...multiple personalitieies, some paralyzed with an intelligence ive never seen matched, some aware of others, others not... some telling me, if i leave theyll make her kill herself, tell me what shell hear, then later, she sais she hears exactly what im told, the other person watching over for only 2 days of the 2 weeks is so ptsd.... genius engineering student... now cant even leave safeway as a cashier... and her supposed schizophrenia, which if she was turned in would have resulted in her power of autorney gone, ect., and moreso, so would have slit her throat before anyone got there if i even took an eye off her... and it all went away, 5 min, 6 years, yeah, nothing but 4.0's in all honesty being the fittest person, most devoted mountain climber ive ever seen... and now u know why im so intolerant of mediocrity, i know all the lit that triggered it, multiple horrendous chuldhood events i had to listen too in detail which allows certain meds to bring out so called schizoeffective.... and 19 diagnoses in a 2 year span, 20 pikks a day, to driving all over th us, volunteering with kids in africa, almost dying there of an infection from bad water, after being flagged as a top accountant, insane salary, because it wasn't her, now rocking the 4.0 in something else, the main sell, freedom, to travel, anywhere, be a vagabond, not have to be abused by these ridiculous titles, government regulations telling me what i can and can't do to myself... while the fda has no problems with quieneptine, but makes tianeptine do clinical trials after a 20 year pure safety record to protect lilys prozac patent... why would i respect someone with a title who doesn't even know the history of his discipline, who wants to **** chicks, drive a ferarri (the irony is ill end up with a 7 figure salary and give half of it away, you know it... but worst of all, your sloppiness and concern for cash, like a physician who caused my anorexic friends death... yeah, when i say i know nothing, ive only read a couple hundred pages... 5 friends, my vision, the depersonalization, i was right second visit... yeah, i wanna help the disadvantaged and someones religion is opposed to my evidence based methods... i may sound malevolent to some people, but if uve seen what ive seen, and what the costs to families are... i don't give a **** if you're an md, Canadian, anything, if you're not par excellence, you can destroy so many lives... and honestly, i am intimidating, do you think cma presidents have random convos with ass kissing pavlovian robots who want to impress their attending... for a nice eval... you know, i read a lot, a ****ing lot, and ill call an attending out right there if they make a rediculous mistake in their scope, this is life, death, and the human suffering that is the worst of it all... and u know, at this point, u cant shut me up, because the title means nothing when you look utterly incompetent compared to a student, this isn;t ubiquitous to all fields, but i notice the laissez faireness more than others and some, and don't think i need a good eval from your dumb ass..., horrible evals are outliers when someone is otherwise universally evaluated as inanely good... don't take my word for it, watch me "please come up and demonstrate therapy, if you're ok with that, we think the residents could really pick up a lot... and the one resident is trying to save face after by saying he's bio oriented, and its coool we all have our niches, and im thinking my tangent engulfs your primary practice modality... one week, put your money where your mouth is and if your that good, that motivated, that disgusted by the lack of regard for the suffering half assing it can cause... and on the surface, abrasive, aggressive... but for what purpose... it sucks knowing you have the ability to procure change, not be ignorant of consequences, and to feel that responsibility because of extreme emotional connection to other people... but a few people here wouldnt get that

 

 

 

I don't know about myself, but I know Muse87 isn't. He's got 14 girlfriends, 7 wives, 4 pets, and a partridge in a peartree across 5 continents.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewfieMike Newbie

NewfieMike

Posted
Posted

surprising trend. Sort of awkward statistically because if one person is in a relationship, that means equally another person has to be.

 

So really if 2/3 of a sample said they were "in a relationship" and 1/3 was not, you could sort of say equal numbers were and weren't in a relationship. Or is that incorrect?

 

Someone argue with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Che.Kree Newbie

Che.Kree

Posted
Posted
surprising trend. Sort of awkward statistically because if one person is in a relationship, that means equally another person has to be.

 

So really if 2/3 of a sample said they were "in a relationship" and 1/3 was not, you could sort of say equal numbers were and weren't in a relationship. Or is that incorrect?

 

Someone argue with me.

 

to be able to say that, you have to stipulate "the equal number of what" is or is not in a relationship, bc if you say equal nr of people from say , a set, it would be wrong => you have group A. 1/3 are Not and group B. 2/3 are in a relationship;

 

to consider you affirmation true, you have to consider the subsets of each group, and still, it would be true only in the case of one subset (one of the both partners) and with the condition that those 2/3s are in relationship with each other:

 

e.g. you have the Partner "alpha" NOT in relationship - makes 100% from the group A, and you have another partner "alpha" IN relationship with partner "betha" wich both make 100% og group B, but separately taken are 50% , ctd 1/3 each, so you have equal nr of partners "alpha" , from the given set, are and are not in relationship

 

...which is not the case when speaking about the partners "betha"...sorry guys, I love the set theory and would continue with pleasure to give another examples here, but I love my weekends more, and have to leave right now,

 

but I liked your question NewfieMike, I bet you knew the answer before asking the question and would be able to answer it more elaborate than I did (if I did... not sure all is clear, but as I said, gonna go)

 

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewfieMike Newbie

NewfieMike

Posted
Posted
to be able to say that, you have to stipulate "the equal number of what" is or is not in a relationship, bc if you say equal nr of people from say , a set, it would be wrong => you have group A. 1/3 are Not and group B. 2/3 are in a relationship;

 

to consider you affirmation true, you have to consider the subsets of each group, and still, it would be true only in the case of one subset (one of the both partners) and with the condition that those 2/3s are in relationship with each other:

 

e.g. you have the Partner "alpha" NOT in relationship - makes 100% from the group A, and you have another partner "alpha" IN relationship with partner "betha" wich both make 100% og group B, but separately taken are 50% , ctd 1/3 each, so you have equal nr of partners "alpha" , from the given set, are and are not in relationship

 

...which is not the case when speaking about the partners "betha"...sorry guys, I love the set theory and would continue with pleasure to give another examples here, but I love my weekends more, and have to leave right now,

 

but I liked your question NewfieMike, I bet you knew the answer before asking the question and would be able to answer it more elaborate than I did (if I did... not sure all is clear, but as I said, gonna go)

 

;)

 

makes sense. So really you compare the number of people "not in a relationship" with 1/2 the people "in a relationship" to make comparisons. That'll work out to 1/3 of the total sample for both.

 

I like when things add up to 100%. We do this analysis where we take a group of cells and can calculate what percent of them is in G1, S, G2, and M. The 4 percentages of course always add up to 100%. Then we introduce a drug that makes cells divide slower, and as a result the percentage of M goes down and the percentages of G1 and G2 go up. A lot of people will just run say a t-test on the S component (say on average 15% vs. 5%) but this is so wrong because the data is of frequency origin and not just raw parametric counting. If one number goes up, others MUST go down. Chi-square testing of distribution changes is where it's at!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...