Username100 Posted July 16, 2015 Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 Hey guys, how far along should a potential publication be before we mention it on an ABS? I.e. should it be submitted for review at the least? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emojis4Life Posted July 16, 2015 Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 Ideally, it should be accepted or in press. I've seen people include submitted pubs too so I suppose if your research section needs some beefing up, it doesn't hurt to include it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Username100 Posted July 16, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 Ideally, it should be accepted or in press. I've seen people include submitted pubs too so I suppose if your research section needs some beefing up, it doesn't hurt to include it. My research section is like a newly spawned calf who's malnourished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambi Posted July 16, 2015 Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 As far as I understand, this non-publication does not exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thatonekid Posted July 16, 2015 Report Share Posted July 16, 2015 I've seen applications where the paper is submitted, but not yet published. You can include it if you feel the need to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Username100 Posted July 17, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2015 I've seen applications where the paper is submitted, but not yet published. You can include it if you feel the need to. Yea, I think it might be necessary. However, I was also thinking I could just write that I've been researching for a couple years. That would count as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maybenow Posted July 22, 2015 Report Share Posted July 22, 2015 As far as I understand, this non-publication does not exist. Yea, I think it might be necessary. However, I was also thinking I could just write that I've been researching for a couple years. That would count as well. Intersting. What if at one point in time, you did some casual lab work or research and you did not publish? Where should you discuss that (should you discuss that)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roro2555 Posted July 22, 2015 Report Share Posted July 22, 2015 Intersting. What if at one point in time, you did some casual lab work or research and you did not publish? Where should you discuss that (should you discuss that)? Under volunteer or employment depending on the experience type Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maybenow Posted September 13, 2015 Report Share Posted September 13, 2015 Under volunteer or employment depending on the experience type Is that the consensus? Can any others pitch in? (I recall reading threads on this before but now I'm not able to search for them/find said threads). 1) Does it matter if you were paid/unpaid (unpaid = not employment). In this specific abs example, I was NOT paid. Basically, I've done research that involved a) NOT being paid (yes, I was a volunteer lab rat once, just to get my foot in the door). 2) It does seem to matter that your work in the lab did NOT involve your being an author/publishing - okay, in this case, don't put it under 'research' then? But how would you describe it/discuss in the little 150 character box? Please help! Thank youuuuuu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ow1234 Posted September 13, 2015 Report Share Posted September 13, 2015 For me, I view volunteering in a research lab as purely doing volunteer work (i.e. stocking pipettes, etc.), while if you have your own project, or you're doing your own experiments (i.e. have independent creativity/control) it would be considered as research...but I'm still debating this topic myself haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.