1994 Posted October 29, 2016 Report Share Posted October 29, 2016 Just picked this up for science. Can anyone comment on its representation of the real DAT? I'm finding that some questions are worded terribly and are also really random. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BScDMD Posted October 30, 2016 Report Share Posted October 30, 2016 I found all IQ Publications (carving, PAT, Science, and RC) to be huge waste of money. Very poorly written and nothing like the real thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Watson Posted October 30, 2016 Report Share Posted October 30, 2016 I liked it for PAT. Occasional wrong answers... but I still thought it was good and looked like the real exam. I'd say combine IQ publications with DATBootcamp, Ferallis, and Barons. Also first year bio and chem notes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1994 Posted October 30, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2016 Finding quite a few incorrect answers, numerous typos and poor question structure. Would not recommend this to anyone (for sciences at least). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cleanup Posted October 30, 2016 Report Share Posted October 30, 2016 Anything that has wrong answers isn't worth your time. Consistency is important when you're practicing for the DAT. There can't be any ambiguity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
121227123 Posted October 31, 2016 Report Share Posted October 31, 2016 There are definitely some mistakes in the science ones and I agree some are really random. When comparing IQ PAT to PAT in bootcamp, I would have to say that IQ is waayy easier. That being said I havent taken the DAT yet (I'm taking it this Saturday) so I can't compare. However, had I known how much easier IQ was, I probably wouldn't have bought them. Just my input Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.