Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums

Canadian Medical School Tuitions


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Edict said:

Your point still stands but technically if you added compulsary fees, NOSM is cheaper. 

ha, true - that is almost annoying because I wanted to was the lowest rather than nearly the lowest - still makes not a lot of sense. Maybe there is some economy of scale here but you would think the costs of a major city would just be more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ontario schools' tuition was already on the worse end for Canadian schools but have gotten out of control. $4-5k difference in costs per year from when I started, with rather minimal changes in actual education. Still have no idea where that money goes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ralk said:

Ontario schools' tuition was already on the worse end for Canadian schools but have gotten out of control. $4-5k difference in costs per year from when I started, with rather minimal changes in actual education. Still have no idea where that money goes...

not into the medical school program itself but to support the overall school. Effectively it is a form of tax on future high income earners to subsidize other programs as I see it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rmorelan said:

not into the medical school program itself but to support the overall school. Effectively it is a form of tax on future high income earners to subsidize other programs as I see it.  

Yeah, that lines up with the best explanation I've gotten from any school, though considering tuition is increasing pretty much across the board and I can't think of any university program where the expenditures on students exceeds what the university gets in tuition and subsidies for their enrollment, I'm not inclined to buy that argument as valid. I'm all for a balancing between those who do or will have means and those who don't, but I don't see that happening here, nor would it be a very efficient way of doing so if it were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ralk said:

Yeah, that lines up with the best explanation I've gotten from any school, though considering tuition is increasing pretty much across the board and I can't think of any university program where the expenditures on students exceeds what the university gets in tuition and subsidies for their enrollment, I'm not inclined to buy that argument as valid. I'm all for a balancing between those who do or will have means and those who don't, but I don't see that happening here, nor would it be a very efficient way of doing so if it were.

Interestingly, I think tuitions would have gone up a lot faster for domestic students in the past 5 years had universities not become more reliant on international student fees. Taking Ontario universities as an example, international student fees as a percentage of total 'revenues' increased the fastest of all income sources for universities. Conversely, provincial sources in the form of grants/subsidies/transfers have declined (mostly because it was kept static from an absolute $ perspective). International students are undoubtedly 'footing the bill' and subsidizing domestic student tuitions and Canadian universities are becoming hooked on this cash cow. This has gone by unnoticed for a while because only domestic student fees are regulated, and universities can charge whatever they want for international student fees (i.e., deregulated/unregulated). Everyone is more or less happy in the Canadian landscape - provinces froze the transfers, domestic students didn't see 'drastic' increases - usually only 2-3% annual increases, and universities have balanced budgets. This is largely how universities have been dealing with the funding gap in their budgets in the past little while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, la marzocco said:

Interestingly, I think tuitions would have gone up a lot faster for domestic students in the past 5 years had universities not become more reliant on international student fees. Taking Ontario universities as an example, international student fees as a percentage of total 'revenues' increased the faster of all income sources for universities. Conversely, provincial sources have declined (mostly because it was kept static). International students are undoubtedly 'footing the bill' and subsidizing domestic student tuitions and Canadian universities are becoming hooked on this cash cow.

Oh, there's no doubt the relative value for Canadian students is better than for International students, but to me that just makes the insanity of tuition costs more pronounced. I'm of the opinion that the absolute value of post-secondary education falls below a reasonable standard for Canadian students - for International students, it's just mind-boggling. Learning and knowledge transmission has never been easier or cheaper, with medical knowledge being no exception (at least at the medical school level, less so for specialist-level knowledge). Even human costs should be declining as schools draw more on non-tenure-track teachers. Yet costs keep going up, and up, and up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/03/2018 at 9:47 PM, JohnGrisham said:

Very nice for Quebec... Memorial, Manitoba and Alberta....  even Calgary(3 years only!)

Memorials tuition has been the same since I started in 2007.

Regular undergrad is also very inexpensive there. The province has a longstanding policy of keeping tuition very low to attract students. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2018 at 9:53 PM, ralk said:

Oh, there's no doubt the relative value for Canadian students is better than for International students, but to me that just makes the insanity of tuition costs more pronounced. I'm of the opinion that the absolute value of post-secondary education falls below a reasonable standard for Canadian students - for International students, it's just mind-boggling. Learning and knowledge transmission has never been easier or cheaper, with medical knowledge being no exception (at least at the medical school level, less so for specialist-level knowledge). Even human costs should be declining as schools draw more on non-tenure-track teachers. Yet costs keep going up, and up, and up.

I'm guessing universities are funneling that money into research and new buildings/maintenance. Additionally, governments are always looking for ways to cut the amount of money they spend on universities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 110 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...