Guest AH800 Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 I just finished 3rd year and although I had a pretty solid average a couple of low grades will drop my GPA to about 3.68 this year and 3.69 cumulative. My question is will med school admission look at certain course as more important than others when considering applications or just look at the overall GPA? For instance this past year my grades were; 98, 96, 92, 85, 84, 84, 83, 80, 79, 71. The 98, 96, and 92 were in nutrition, physiology, and genetics while the 71 was in some environmental course which I really hated. Will admissions people actually take these things into consideration, since physiology is pretty important to medicine while environmental chemistry is not? This sort of thing seems to happen every year to me, and since I have 1 semester at less than full I cannot use U of T's weighting formula so I have to stick with my 3.69 gpa:( . I'm going to try and pull off more consistency in 4th year, but I also want to apply this coming cycle and just want to know what people generally think about my situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Law Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 I think that most schools look at your GPA and don't differentiate between different courses. From what I've read, at Western the cutoff is firm. This year the cutoff was 3.7 for consideration. The same thing with Queens, you either make it over all four years (this year it was 3.68), or you have a shot at making the "last 2 years" cutoff (I believe it was 3.78). However, other schools like McMaster and U of T don't have firm cutoffs and may still review your application. U of T says that the minimum acceptable GPA is usually around a 3.6, keep in mind that's just the minimum. With all the extra applications, the GPA has increased over the last few years, but I'm sure you still have a shot at many schools. You said that you had a 3.69 cummulative... but not all schools look at your cummulative GPA. Western only requires 1 year above the cutoff for an interview, but you need 2 if you are going to be accepted. I hope that helps out a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest peachy Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 At some schools your transcript may be looked at informally, or you could be asked about your weaker grades in your interview. But for GPA cutoff purposes, I agree with TheLaw that it doesn't make any difference in which course you earned what grade... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AH800 Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Thanks, that's pretty much what I thought. It's a pretty tough pill to swallow having one grade make me go from being a decently competitive applicant (including ec's etc.), to not even meeting the cutoffs to apply. The Law, when you say 1 year at 3.7 to get an interview and 2 above to get accepted, does this imply that the 4th year is the 2nd year above 3.7? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Yangzie Posted May 5, 2006 Report Share Posted May 5, 2006 yea gpa is all about consistency... and that you choose ur courses *wisely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Law Posted May 11, 2006 Report Share Posted May 11, 2006 If you have only one year 3.7 and greater when you apply, you can get a conditional offer of acceptance from UWO. It would be conditional on your current year also being 3.7 and greater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.