Illuminis Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 For this section: Indicate the type of publications: paper, abstract and presentation at a scientific meeting etc., accepted or published with a reference, but not submitted or in preparation. I am taking this to mean two possible things: 1) Only mention it if it's accepted or published. Include reference. 2) Only include reference if it's accepted or published. If it's submitted or in preparation, you don't need to include reference. I have a paper that's just submitted. I really want to include it, but I hope I'm not misreading the instructions. Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HBP Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 1. You cannot include submittied or in preparation. It must be accepted and have a specific publication date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benhc911 Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 You can however mention it in something other than the research section... perhaps under employment, or very simplified in other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montoya Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 What happens if its a thesis paper? Or if you did research but its not published? Because it says ""Use the 'Verifiers' function to provide the name and location of your employer. Do not list research positions which are part of your graduate training or honours program. These should be listed under the Research section." So, what happens if you didn't "publish" anything? It still says to list it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HBP Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 List your project as research. But you're not listing you got a publication out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KamG Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Hi, Last min question... Im still not sure which category to put my research that I've been working at for a 3 months (in a chem lab). I have no pub but my supervisor thinks I could get one in a couple months. I really want to put it somewhere as it is my only research experiance. Do you think it's okay to put it under Research but then to put something like "project in progress, possible publication in future" in the publication part? Thanks for your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flav_cool Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Hmm I never realized that it said not to put unpublished research... I think I'll leave it anyway. BTW I put a published review article under awards and accomplishments. Should I move it to research? I put a conference presentation as xtracurricular, should I put it under research? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flav_cool Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Urgen bump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micro Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Hmm I never realized that it said not to put unpublished research... I think I'll leave it anyway. BTW I put a published review article under awards and accomplishments. Should I move it to research? I put a conference presentation as xtracurricular, should I put it under research? Although a published review article is quite an accomplishment, as far as the applications goes, I think it's more suitable under the "Research" category. Same goes for conference presentation IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flav_cool Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Although a published review article is quite an accomplishment, as far as the applications goes, I think it's more suitable under the "Research" category. Same goes for conference presentation IMO. Ok great... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KamG Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Hi, Last min question...Im still not sure which category to put my research that I've been working at for a 3 months (in a chem lab). I have no pub but my supervisor thinks I could get one in a couple months. I really want to put it somewhere as it is my only research experiance. Do you think it's okay to put it under Research but then to put something like "project in progress, possible publication in future" in the publication part? Thanks for your help. Hey guys anybody think what I said above would be ok? or should I list is under "other" or something? Time is ticking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flav_cool Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Yea I think it should be ok. I did the same for work that hasn't been published. But I just put N/A for the publications box since it says not to say it's under review. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micro Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Hey guys anybody think what I said above would be ok? or should I list is under "other" or something? Time is ticking I don't see why not... Just check the instructions in the "Research" category (once you expand it to enter additional details) that there isn't anything written there that would make you think otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.