Writer's Corner: Free Essay Grading by PastaInhaler

[PastaInhaler]

--clicked--

 

In politics, loyalty always shifts.

 

Describe a specific situation in politics where loyalty might not shift. Discuss what you think determines when political loyalty will shift and when it will not.

 

In a democratic society, the loyalty of citizens of a nation to political candidates constantly shifts. With new political candidates on the rise, new ideas are continually to being expressed, and as a result individuals tend to support candidates which are currently popular. Candidates who are elected by the public may lose the public favor when they are unable to deliver the goals guaranteed by the individual prior to election into office. Additionally, if political candidates are unable to improve current conditions in the country, this may disfavoured by the public. Thus, in politics the loyalty to the candidates by the public always shifts.

 

One example which demonstrates the rapid shift of the public perception's of a political candidate is the current candidacy of Barack Obama, serving as the President of the United States of America. Prior to the election, the United States economy was encountering it's biggest economic recession in history, and the morale of American citizens were at an all time low. The Presidential candidate, Barack Obama, arrived on the scene, and delivered hope to the American people. His political campaign centered around the notion "Yes, we can" and promised the American people that he could deliver and pull American out of the economic depression they were encountering. He proposed a long term economic policy aimed to do so, and made a list of promises that would be done, upon being elected into office, such as getting rid of the prison, Guantonomo Bay. Since his debut into office; however, the public favour of President Obama has declined. It has been two years since his election into office, and the US economy is more stagnant than ever. Furthermore, the economy policy, as proposed by Obama is failing, as the monetary injections have put further strain on the American economy. Promises by Barack Obama have not been fulfilled, as the presence of the Guantonomo Bay still exists. As a result, public favour of Obama had declined steadily since his election into office, plummeting from 60% to 35% of the total American population. Obama was unable to deliver in his goals and promises of bringing the nation of America out of the economic crises endured, and as a result political loyalty changed.

 

There are instances; however, when the loyalty of the public does not shift. When political candidates are successful in improving conditions for the citizens of a nation, and deliver in their promised goals, they do not lose the favour of the public. One example of this is Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who served time in office from 1992-2000. In running for Prime Minister, Harper promised Canadians that the quality of life in Canada would be tremendously improved. Throughout the time in office, he was able to pass several legislature policies and laws, all of which made the lives of Canadians better. He enacted in education reforms, made appropriate changes to the health care which would better provide for families, and made changes in Canada's foreign policy such that domestic firms no longer had to directly compete with foreign firms. Many Canadians acknowledge that he did a solid job in the time in his office, and public favour of him as Prime Minister was maintained at 70% of the total population of Canada. Thus, when a political candidate is able to improve the conditions of a nation, and deliver on the goals promised prior to being elected, public loyalty is not lost.

 

Therefore, in politics, public loyalty towards a political candidate changes depends on whether or not that individual elected into office is able to make changes which benefit the citizens of a nation. As seen in the case of President Obama, he was unable to improve the stagnant economic conditions of the United States of America, or deliver in any of the promises he made prior to his election into office. As a result of such, he lost much of the public vote since his election into office, and public loyalty shifted against him. On the other hand, if a political candidate is able to improve the conditions of a nation, as seen in the case of Stephen Harper, loyalty does not shift. Through successful reforms during his time in office, Harper retained a steady level of public favour.

 

lol sorry i use stephen harper all the time, he is like my go to example for everything

 

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Demonstrates proficiency in responding to the tasks.

 

Remember that the same AAMC grader will be grading the essays for the same prompt. If Stephen Harper is your goto example, make sure that you have all the details down pat. If other essay writers were to use Harper as their example, and their facts on average are different from yours, the grader's subconscious opinion of your essay may become slightly more unfavourable.

 

I feel this essay will be scored a:

JKLMNOP/QRST

[PastaInhaler]

Hi there, clicked. Thanks again very much for taking a look:

 

Voters should not be concerned about a political candidate’s personal life.

 

Any politician running for public office faces a challenge: He or she must be open and transparent with the voters of the riding in order to gain their trust and honesty, but at the same time there may be aspects of their lives they would prefer to keep under wraps. Consider a Western politician, running for office with no history of wrongdoing or suspicious behaviour. Should the public be concerned about banal things such as what television shows he prefers and if his favourite pastime is something like riding a motorbike? Such investigations are unwarranted intrusions into the privacy of an individual and can be detrimental to his campaign by turning away swing voters who focus on these issues that are ultimately irrelevant to his political prowess.

 

However, there are times when intrusion is warranted. Consider the case of Anthony Weiner, an American politician who recently had explicit pictures of himself leaked to the Internet. Further examination revealed details of salacious text messages to other women, and the fact that he lied and was the one who posted the images. Such behaviour is, to say the least, unbecoming of a married man or a politician.. A look into the private life may help the public understand why these actions were committed, whether, in this case, due to an unsavoury disposition of character or perhaps something forgivable like stress and overwork. In this case, the scrutiny would help out the individual and the public: the former by offering him a chance to redeem his image, and the latter by offering them a chance to correct a misperception.

 

The factor that differentiates these two scenarios then, is their record of action as accountable to the voters. Intrusion should be a responsive measure, not a preemptive one. Operating under the premise of innocent until proven guilty, an individual with no history or indication of malicious deeds should not have their privacy shattered. He or she has done no wrong or set off any alarm bells, and should be given the benefit of the doubt. But if one has demonstrated a history of misdeeds and suspicious behaviour, the public has the right to know the background of the deed, to better judge him. By abusing the trust that the voters have placed in him, the politician in this case has to answer to his constituents. A candidate's personal life is undoubtedly as precious to them as to any other person, but politicians run on a system of public accountability and honesty. The notion of privacy is forfeited when the public's trust is misappropriated or lost.

 

You're welcome.

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

Some control of language is evident.

Some issues with clarity of thought and coherence.

Some ideas may be underdeveloped.

 

You may need to go in a little more detail with the second example. What was the outcome of the scrutiny of the political candidate's personal life? Did it in fact restore his public image?

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKLMNOPQRST

[PastaInhaler]

--clicked--

 

For a politician, honesty is the surest route to failure.

Describe a specific situation in which a politician's honesty might not lead to failure. Discuss what you think determines whether or not a politician's honesty will lead to failure.

 

I decided to go with a different format, 4 paragraphs instead of 3

 

In a democractic government, power has been given to the people - they have the freedom to elect whom they feel would best serve their interest in the government. As such, public perception of a political candidate is very important, as the citizens of a nation can decide ultimately who is elected into office. In politics, honesty - telling the truth - is often seen as a weakness. Often times, when a political candidate is honest, the individual publicly acknowledges that he or she has made a mistake, and this can be construed by the citizens of the nation as a failure. As a result, this will lead to the candidates failure - he or she will lose public loyalty, and support of the individual as a political candidate will fall. Thus, a political candidate's honesty often leads to his or her downfall.

 

One example which demonstrates how honesty leads to failure is exemplified by George Lapierre, during his time served as the mayor of Quebec during 1992. When Lapierre was first elected into office, he promised the citizens of Quebec that at the end of his term in office, he would make strides in the government which would recognize the French culture as unique, and seek to seperate Quebec seperate from the country of Canada. As the end of his term neared; however, Lapierre was unable to fulfill many of the promises he set forth to do prior to being elected, and many of the Quebec residents were sorely dissapointed with the candidate they had elected into the government. Lapierre had made a statement in how he willingly acknowledged that he failed the French people, admitting that he had not been true to his promises, but that he learned from his mistakes, and would better represent the French people next time in office. However, this honesty was seen by the Quebec people as a sign of weakness, and failure of such a political candidate. The public believed that Lapierre's wilingness to acknowledge his failures in politics represented a candidate that they could not support, and would not continue to vote for him. As a result, during the next election for the mayor in Quebec, Lapierre had lost the majority of the public vote in Quebec. This instance serves as an example where the honesty of a political candidate lead to his ultimate failure as a political candidate.

 

There are instances; however, in which the honesty of a political may not lead to his or her downfall. For example, when Simon Giuelles was running for Mayor in British Columbia during 1997, many of his political enemies had dug up dirt on him and had submitted it to the press. He recieved much ciriticism as it was discovered that he had been in jail during his teen years. In a public conference, Giuelles had willingly admitted that he had been in jail. He had described the hardship he had faced as a trouble teen, having no sense of direction, yet he was able to convince the public that through such experiences he had learned from it, and had developed many qualities through it such as perserverence and integrity. As a result of such, many of the voters in the province of British Columbia were sympathetic with his story, and they believed that this experience demonstrated the potential of Giuelles being a strong political candidate. Giuelles was honest with his past, and he was able to use such an experience in his past a source of strength, to foster a better public image among the people. In doing so, he was overwhelmingly elected into office in 1998.

 

Thus, a political candidate's honesty will lead to failure or not is determined whether or not his or her honesty has to do with the mistakes or failings during the time they have served in office. Lapierre was honest with the mistakes that he had made during his time in office with the Quebec people, and as a result, the people saw this as a sign of weakness, and an inability to represent the Quebec people. In this instance, Lapierre utlimately failed as a result. On the other hand, Guielles was honest with his upbringing, and how he was a troubled youth and spent time in jail. This honesty was not during his time in office, and from this experience people saw this as one which represent how this individual had developed. As a result, Giuelles was able to use this to his favour, and succeeded politically by gaining the votes of the people.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language with some grammatical or usage problem.

Ideas presented in a coherent manner with some focus.

Demonstrates proficiency in responding to the tasks.

Good use of the Lapierre and Giuelles examples to illustrate your points.

 

I feel this essay will be scored a:

JKLMNOPQRST

[PastaInhaler]

-clicked-

 

Thanks so much Pasta!

 

Advancements in communication technology have reduced the quality of human interacation.

 

Technology is advancing at a rapid rate, and this pervades most aspects of human life. Technology can be defined as a tool, developed by people. Human beings are highly social creatures, and the area of communication has been greatly affected technological advancements. Communication technology can refer to many things, from the very basic pen and paper to the highly advanced cellular phone and computing devices and software that are prevalent today. Sadly, as communication technology advances, the quality of human interaction as facilitated by this technology decreases. Text messaging has become a common method of communication. Text messaging has led to 'txt tlk', which is a grammatically imprecise use of language. In order to use the least number of characters, vowels are often dropped and sometimes digits are used in their place. To an individual who is not well versed in 'txt tlk', the messages can be incomprehensible. To compound matters, the text message also reduces the quality of communication because fine aspects such as tone cannot be conveyed. When used to convey every day information, as a primary source of communication, the quality of communication suffers greatly. Indeed, these advances in technology have led to a decrease in the quality of human interaction.

 

However, in some situations, communication has been enhanced by utilizing advances in communication technology. For example, internet social media services, such as facebook and Twitter have been integral in the facilitation of communication between individuals in the repressive countries fighting for democracy. The recent successful protests and revolutions in Egypt and Tunisia were made possible by social media, which allowed the protestors to communicate with each other and with the outside world. Indeed, social media has given a voice to the oppressed in Syria, because members of the public can post pictures and video to social media of government abuses. By using social media, these citizens can prove government abuse even when the government denies this abuse. Clearly, by giving voices to oppressed and by allowing protestors to communicate with each other, these advancements in communication technology have improved the quality of human interactions.

 

In some situations, advanced communication technology has decreased the quality of social interaction, while in other situations, this same technology has greatly enhanced the quality of human communication. It is the situation which determines whether communication technology enhances or inhibits the quality of communication. Generally, when the situation is mundane, and people are using lazy 'txt tlk' simply to discuss unimportant matters, technological advances have decreased the quality of human interactions. When advanced communication technologies such as social media are used to allow protestors to communicate, or to give voice to the oppressed, this technology enhances the quality of human interaction. The situation determines whether communication technology enhances or detracts to the quality of human interactions.

 

You're welcome.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

One essay per post please.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of clarity and depth of thought.

 

Demonstrates proficiency in responding to the tasks.

The 'txt tlk' and social media examples are sufficient in supporting your arguments.

 

I feel this essay will be scored a:

JKLMNOPQ/RST

[PastaInhaler]

--clicked---

 

Most financial decisions are made because of greed.

 

Financial decisions are those which directly affect the finances of an individual or a company. These crucial decisions can be the deliberating factor of whether an individual or company financially succeeds or fails. However, in many cases, success is measured by the profit made and thus, financial decisions are driven by greed- the prospect of making more. A prime example of this can be seen by the actions of many individuals during the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States. The subprime mortgage crisis occurred as a result of two main factors. The first being the lack of caution excericsed by bank and financial institutions who granted loans to individuals that would not normally qualify due to various reasons such as a poor credit history or income. The second is result of greed from these financially unstable individuals who made the decision to borrow hundreds of thousands of dollars from banks to purchase houses in hopes of selling them for profit at the peak of the housing bubble. It is the greed of these individuals that drove them to make speculative financial decisions and thus, when the housing market crashed, their finances fell with it, resulting in thousands of defaults in loans and the effective onset of the economic recession. As can be seen in this scenario, financial decisions made by individuals were driven by the prospect on making more via the housing market. Unfortunately for them, their greed led to poor decision making and their concurrent bankruptcy.

 

However, not all financial decisions are made because greed. Indivduals or companies who have an altruistic outlook on life base their decisions instead on the welfare of society. For example, Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft and self made muli billionaire, recently announced that he would donate his earnings to charitable organizations rather than keep it for himself and his family. Gates, realizing the various shortcomings the world experiences, such as poverty, places higher value on the well being of society than the prospect of making more money for himself. Consequently, his financial decisions for his family are not based on greed.

 

Whether financial decisions are made based on greed or not depends entirely on the values an individual or company has. Those who value the bettering of one self make decisions based on greed. This can clearly be seen in the individuals who, driven by the prospect of making more money through the housing market, make the decision to apply for loans that they could not afford. Conversely, those, such as Bill Gates, who value altruism and the bettering of society, make financial decisions absent of greed. Rather than focusing on making more for himself and his family, he decides to aid those in need through charitable organizations. Thus, it can be said upon analysis of these two examples that those who make financial decisions absent of greed will better benefit the society than those who base it on greed.

 

thanks alot

 

You're welcome.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of clarity and depth of thought.

 

Somewhat of a nitpicky detail, but if you mention Bill Gates in such a context, remember to include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and mention Gates' approximate networth and the percentage that he will donate to charity upon his death. These are just little details, but they add more 'oomph' to your essay, aside from the increased plausibility of your argument.

Remember to stress the "for oneself" aspect of greed in your definition at the beginning, it will create better contrast later in your essay.

 

I feel this essay will be scored a:

JKLMNOPQ/RST

[PastaInhaler]

-cllicked--

 

thanks for marking the essays

 

A nation’s history is shaped more by popular ideas than by the actions of its government.

 

Describe a specific situation in which a nation’s history might be shaped more by the actions of its government than by popular ideas. Discuss what you think determines whether a nation’s history is shaped more by popular ideas or by the actions of its government.

 

Democracy allows for the freedom of speech, and thus ultimately gives power to ideas of individuals. The history of a nation includes the culture, the reality of life during that time period, all of which are predecessors to the current time. Popular ideas, which are well recognized and prevalent in society are well respected, and acknowledged by everyone, and this shapes a nation’s history more than actions of the government. For instance, during the 1700-1800’s in France, this time period is remembered or marked as the “Enlightenment period,” where many new ideas had been generated in society. There were salons, where the nobility gathered to discuss prevalent and popular ideas of the time. One of these ideas was the government system proposed by the French philosopher Rosseau, which basically dictated how a government should be run and it’s responsibilities to the people. This idea was overwhelmingly accepted by everyone in society, and in 1740, the parliamentry system, as proposed by Rosseau was implemented into effect in France. Popular ideas during this time in France flourished during the time of enlightenment, and this influenced the culture and governmental system of French - ultimately, the history as we know it today. Thus, in this case, the history of France was influenced greatly by popular ideas rather than governmental action.

 

There are instances; however, when the history of a country is influenced to a higher degree by governmental action, rather than popular ideas. Governmental intervention are policies, laws, and regulations which are put in place by political officials which citizens of a nation must adhere to or abide by. For example, the history of Germany is defined by the actions Nazi government during World War II, a period which lasted from 1939-1945. During the Nazi’s reign, they implemented many laws which were based on the idea that German people to be superior to any other race, and demanded the extermination of less inferior “species” such as the Jews and Gypsies. Although it is noted that such were popular ideas, it is the governmental policies which stemmed from these ideas which define the history of Germany during this time. Through these laws, the Nazi government were able to Jewish and Gyspy people from the general public, and put them into concentration camps. Furthermore, laws were drawn which made legal and mandatory the killing of these minority groups. Looking back at Germany during the World War II, the history is defined primarily by the actions of Nazi - a radical governmental group, who put into place many laws which killed millions of people. Thus, in this instance, history is influenced more so by the actions of the government, rather than popular ideas.

 

The history of a nation is shaped more by popular ideas rather than governmental policies depend whether or not these actions by the government are involved in something radical, such as the killing of minority groups. If the government has not enacted radical policies, which affect the citizens of a country, then popular ideas may flourish in society, and these ideas are ones which define the history of a nation. France, for example, during the 1800’s was dubbed the age of enlightenment, where ideas flourished in Salon’s affecting the culture, and ultimately the government. This demonstrates an instance where popular ideas affect history more so than governmental regulation. On the otherhand, when the actions of a government engaged in something radical, such as the killing of minority groups in the instance of the Nazi, this defines the history of a nation, more so than the popular ideas during that time.

 

You're welcome.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of some clarity and depth of thought.

 

Demonstrates proficiency in responding to the tasks. However, a reader may take issue with the argument in task#2 and what you derive from task#3. It seems that whether an idea or action is radical or not is irrelevant to the Nazis. It is a matter of whether the ideas or actions will conform to the beliefs of their dictatorial leader. It would be good not to start with democracy in your essay, then lead into an example with Nazis, because it may imply that you consider Nazism to be a democracy. You could talk about governments, then tie in democracy tightly with your first example, then make it clear and explicit that Nazism is a totally different type of governmental regime.

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKLMNO/PQRST

[mangos]

--clicked---

 

 

Compulsory education often inhibits a student's motivation to learn.

 

Education is the means to pass down information from one generation to the next- to equip them for the future to be as successful as possible, individually and amongst society. Thus, it comes to no surprise that Canada makes certain courses within its educational system compulsory, or mandatory, up until one has achieved a high school diploma. However, these mandatory courses, many argue often inhibit a student’s motivation to learn. A prime example is the mandatory music classes that one must take during their primary schooling. It is evident that not every individual has the same enthusiasm for music as others so as a result, when one who strongly dislikes music is forced to take a music class, their motivation to learn in that area drops dramatically. Research has proven that individuals who have a strong interest in a certain area of education and who pursue it, are motivated to excel in that area. Similarly, those who are opposed to that area of education, and yet are mandated to learn, do not excel. As can be seen, compulsory courses within education can often inhibit a student’s motivation to learn if one strongly disfavors the course.

 

In contrast, there are compulsory courses within education that do not inhibit one’s motivation to learn but rather spark one’s curiosity in that field. When a student has an open mind to the various possibilities in the future that certain courses offer, they do not approach compulsory courses with distaste but rather as a challenge and an opportunity to broaden their horizons. For example, the four core subjects, math, english, social studies, and science, are compulsory courses that one must take throughout their highschool career. Each of these courses are prerequistes for future courses in the same area of study. Therefore, high school math is required for those who want to pursue their study in the area of mathematics. With this in mind, those students who want to keep their options open in the future for post secondary education, take all of these compulsory courses. As a result, these courses do not inhibit their motivation to learn, but rather drives their motivation to acquire more knowledge in various fields of study such that their options are open in the future.

 

Whether compulsory education, more specifically, compulsory courses, inhibit one’s motivation to learn or not depends entirely on the mindset of the student. If a student is narrow minded and desires to only learn what he likes and disregard the courses he doesn’t, music for example, then courses that are mandatory that contradict his view will inhibit his motivation to learn. On the other end of the spectrum, those students who have open minds and realize the possibilities that certain courses, such as the four core subjects, offer for them in the future, enroll in these compulsory courses with the mindset of learning more to equip themselves better for future. Thus, as can be seen, it is the difference in mindset of students that determines whether one succeeds or one falls behind.

 

thanks alot pasta! i know im sending in a lot of essays haha..take your time. im just trying to get in as much practice as possible!

[mangos]

--clicked---

 

 

 

The media's use of unethical investigative practices is never justified.

 

The media is a tool to communicate and pass on knowledge from one individual to the next, one community to the next, and even from one nation to another. As such, media has become thoroughly integrated into humanity, and without it, there would be a massive loss of knowledge amongst society. In order for media to bring new information to society, they must use investigative practices. However, there are times when the media’s need to acquire new information have resulted in unethical practices- practices that infringe on the rights of citizens. A prime example of this is the recent allegations against the newspaper flagship, News of the World (NotW), owned by Rupert Murdoch. Recent investigations have shown that journalists employed by NotW have used unethical investigative practices in order to deliver stories to the public. These include hacking into phones of murder victims, soliders in the Iraq and Afghanistan War, and even bombing victims in the London 2005. This is seen as a direct violation of the privacy of indivduals and thus was deemed unethical and not justified as journalists were keen in only benefitting themselves through these stories. As a result of these allegations, criminal investigations have now proceeded and in an effort to protect himself, Murdoch has effectively announced the shut down of NotW. Evidently, this example depicts the unjustifiable act of unethical investigative practices.

 

However, there are cases in which unethical investigative practices by media are justified. For example, in the recent Anthony Weiner scandal, credit is given to various forms of media such as Twitter and text messages on mobile phones to have brought this scandal to light for the American public. Anthony Weiner, former senate out of New York, was found to have been posting nude pictures of himself through Twitter and sending salacious text messages to women outside of his marriage. Through investigations of the media into the private life of Weiner, which can be deemed as unethical, the American public was enlightened about the scandalous acts of their elected political official. As a result of this news, Weiner resigned from his position. Thus, in this case, unethical forms of investigative practices by media have resulted in the positive englightment towards the general public.

 

As can be seen, the media must draw a fine line and determine whether their unethical investigative practices are justified or not. If the practice involves infringement of privacy of individual, it is deemed unethical. Furthermore, if these practices benefit the journalists only, so that they can bring stories to the newspaper, but not society as a whole, these acts are classified as unjustifiable. This was seen in the recent allegations against the journalists employed by News of the World who hacked into phones of murder victims, soliders, and bombing victims, in attempts to attain a story to further themselves as journalists. In contrast, if the unethical investigative practices are committed under the umbrella of altruisim, for the benefit of the society, then these acts may be classified as justified. In the case of Anthony Weiner, the media investigated his private life and revealed to the American public the salacious text messages and pictures he posted on Twitter. Through this, the public was made aware of the conducts of their elected official and subsequently, immediate action was taken due to the mass disgust of citizens and Weiner resigned from his position as Senate.

 

thanks

[PastaInhaler]

-clicked-

 

Most advertising is designed to prevent consumers from making rational choices.

Describe a specific situation in which advertising does or might help consumers make rational choices. Discuss what you think determines whether or not advertising prevents customers from making rational choices.

 

In today's world' date=' media and advertising have a substantial influence on people's decisions. Advertisements are generally targeted towards a specific audience, or customers, whom the companies hope to attract. Often, advertisements depict supernatural or extraordinary events that influence the customers' psyche, consequently affecting their ability to make rational choices. For instance, the deodorant and body spray brand, Axe, is well-known for its advertisements that display increased attraction towards women upon using their product. The advertisement demonstrates a young man using Axe deodorant and body spray, causing the nearby women to irresistibly run toward the man. Such an advertisement causes the viewers and potential customers to believe in the possibilities resulting from using the product, suggesting that men who use their products will be able to attract women with essentially no effort. Although improbable, the customers fall prey to the design of their advertisement and may choose to purchase the product irrationally. Many other beauty and cosmetic products are advertised in a similar design, targeting a specific audience and demonstrating the drastic and positive influence the product will bring to their lives. As a result, these advertisements prevent customers from making rational choices, by believing in what they see.

 

Although most advertising is designed to prevent customers from making rational choices, some advertising does in fact help customers make rational choices. In contrast to beauty and cosmetic products that are designed to be lucrative, other forms of advertising may not share the same intent. For example, some advertisements are solely informative and intend to teach or educate the viewers about the possible advantages or disadvantages of using a certain product or service. For example, the government funds the advertisement of encouraging Canadians to utilize the health care services that are available to them, including physiotherapy, community health care, and hospital care. Consequently, these advertisements are designed to educate and teach viewers about the benefits of regular visits to the doctor, among other advantages, to improve the quality of lives of Canadians without intending to make profits. Hence, they are in fact helping customers make rational choices.

 

The nature and design of advertisements and companies provides insight as to whether or not they prevent customers from making rational choices. Advertisements that intend to gain profits from the customers, such as those promoting beauty and cosmetic products, often prevent customers from making rational choices. These advertisements often portray unrealistic outcomes, causing the viewers to falsely believe in the effects of the products on their lives. As a result, such advertising designs preclude customers from making rational decisions. Conversely, some other advertising is promoted by nonprofitable organizations that intend not to earn profit, but rather to educate and inform viewers regarding benefits and harms of certain products and services. Consequently, advertisements designed to purely educate the viewers rather than to seek profit may in fact help customers make rational choices.

 

Thanks![/quote']

 

You're welcome.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of some clarity of thought.

 

Task #3 was not adequately completed. You must be more explicit in your discussion of what you think determines whether or not advertising prevents customers from making rational choices. If you write that it depends on the nature and designs of advertisements, then you have not explored the idea deeply enough. The AAMC grader will spend a very brief amount of time parsing your essay, and may miss your response to task#3 if it is not written clearly and concisely.

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKLMNO/PQRST

[PastaInhaler]

^ you should probably read this: http://www.premed101.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51813

 

Thanks for posting this, Grey's Anatomy.

[PastaInhaler]

--clicked---

 

Advances in communication have led to a loss of personal privacy.

 

Society today is driven by technological advances and as such, various aspects have continually improved in areas such as communication. Communication has been made more efficient, accessible, easier, and faster. However, these benefits come at the cost of the loss of personal privacy. A prime example of this can be seen upon the emergence of social networking group Facebook. With the introduction of Facebook, communication has been made easy, fast, and accessible. People are able to communicate with others instantaneously through Facebook Chat, a program built in that allows messages to be sent to the recipient immediately. Leaving messages on the “wall” of friends is possible with just the click of one button. Facebook has made it possible to connect with people around the world in an instant. However, despite these benefits, many law suits have been made in regards to the personal privacy of Facebook’s members. Upon registering, Facebook requires some personal information such as one’s name, age, gender, location, etc. This information, many claim, is then given to advertising companies on Facebook, thus leading to a loss of personal privacy. As a result, Facebook has recently increased their security and added privacy options that members can now change. Evidently, despite the advanced technology that Facebook uses in enhancing communication, there is the inherent risk of the loss of personal privacy.

 

However, advances in communication do not always lead to the loss of personal privacy. As long as it does not involve the sharing of personal information, the risk of the intrusion of privacy is absent. Skype, for example, is a form of communication that allows one to make calls from one’s computer to a landline phone or from computer to computer. In addition, it also has the feature of video conferences, allowing one to see who they are talking to. With this advancement in technology, many indivudals and business are able to communicate with one other with ease and versatility. However, unlike Facebook, Skype does not require one to divulge personal information. Thus, it does not have the effect of privacy infringement as Facebook does.

 

What determines whether advances in communication will affect personal privacy depends on whether the divulgence of personal information is required or not. In regards to a social networking site like Facebook, personal information such as name, sex, gender are required upon registering. Thus, Facebook has a greater susceptibility for privacy infringement. In contrast, Skype, while achieving the same benefits of enhanced communication, does not require personal information. As a result, the loss of privacy does not occur with Skype.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of some clarity of thought.

More depth and complexity required.

 

For task #2, you may have to take a different approach, or at least shift the focus a little more. In argument analysis, there is a fallacy called the red herring fallacy. This fallacy means that you bring up an idea that isn't totally relevant to the argument, but is loosely related. Basically, it's kinda on topic, but it doesn't fit in with the argument. Therefore, you should change your approach by focussing on the nature of the communication as you did with the Facebook example. In other words, how safe is Skype itself? Is it secure? Is the audio and video connection protected? Does the company record your calls? What if two guys are discussing a secret international business venture, whose success depends on its secrecy -will it be safer to discuss via Facebook chat or Skype? Shifting this area of focus will cause your essay to have a greater impact on the reader and will improve your line of reasoning, which the AAMC grader will be examining.

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKLMNOPQRST

[PastaInhaler]

--clicked--

 

 

A leader cannot act fairly and at the same time please everyone.

 

In a democratic government, political leaders are elected by their constiuents and thus, have a responsibility to them and the society in which they live. It is expected of these leaders to act fairly, which can be described as performing their duties to the utmost of their ability. One of these duties as a leader is to care for the welfare of the nation. Unfortunately, there are times when acting fairly for the welfare of the nation can lead to some disapproval amongst citizens. A prime example of this is the recent “back to work bill” introduced by the Conservative government led by Prime Minister Steven Harper. Prior to the introduction of this bill, Canada Post employees’ union tried to negotiate a new deal in regards to their wages and pensions. An agreement could not be made so Canada Post employees went on strike. Mail was no longer delievered and this affected many small business in Canada. Seeing this a possible catalyst to another economic recession, Harper introduced the “back to work bill.” This “back to work bill” would effectively force Canada post employees back to work, ending their strike and further negotiations with Canada Post. However, this bill did not meet the requirments that these employees were asking from their employer in reagrds to pension and wages. Thus, many employees were outraged at the bill, stating it was curbing their freedom as workers and union members. On the other hand, this bill had to be enacted as the Canada’s economy was in jeopardy. As can be seen in this situation, a leader cannot act fairly and please everyone at the same time.

 

However, it is possible for leaders to act fairly and please everyone. This occurred when Ralph Klein was still premier of Alberta. In 2005, Alberta had seen a huge boost in its economy due to the rising oil industry, resulting in a surplus in the Alberta budget. Realizing that this economic boost was in part due to the hard work of Alberta, Klein distributed this surplus amongst Albertans in the form of cheques and all Albertans received $400 in the mail. Consequently, there was great praise amongst Albertans for Klein’s decision to give back to his constituents. It is evident in this situation that a leader can act fairly and please his constituents.

 

What determines whether it is possible for a leader to act fairly and please everyone or not depends on whether the act contradicts the views of his constiuents. In the case of Harper’s introduction of the “back to work bill” for Canada Post workers, this act contradicted the views of employees by imposing regulations that did not meet their requirements. In fact, the issued wage was to be lower than what union members were asking. Thus, controversy sparked and Canada Post employees showed great outrage at the bill. Evidently, despite Harper’s attempt to act fairly and for the benefit of the Canadian economy, not everyone was pleased by the enactment of the “back to work bill.” In contrast, Klein was able to act fairly and please his constiuents because every Albertan believed that the economic surplus of Alberta should be given back to Albertans. With this in mind, Premier Klein did so and was met with much praise.

 

thanks!

 

 

You're welcome.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of some clarity of thought.

Issues with integration and complexity.

 

Task#3 is not adequately addressed and the rationale that you provided does not seem like a separate idea, but feeds into a circular argument.

 

You are stating that a leader cannot act fairly and please everyone because what he does contradicts the views of [some of] his constituents [="at the same time won't please everyone."]

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKLMNOPQRST

[PastaInhaler]

--clicked--(nice idea btw) i ran out of time on this one. changed my ideas half way through...please let me know your thoughts thanks

Price is not necessarily a reflection of value

Many have subscribed to the doctrine that if they paid a certain price for a particular product, the amount they paid will correlate to that product's value. In this context, value is understood to mean utility, the ability to fulfil the function that the product is meant to provide. However it is important to note that the price of a product is not necessarily an indicator of the product's value. This is especially true when there are many similar, yet differently priced, alternatives to certain product that all for the most part carry out the same function. Take for example the multitude of handbags that are on the market, ranging from $5 to $5000, all of which serve the same basic function- to carry one's belongings. A Gucci handbag may retail for several thousands of dollars, but it provides the same functionality and thus value as a handbag selling at the local drugstore for merely a few dollars. Therefore in this case, it is apparent that price is not always a reflection of a product's utility, and thus function.

However, in certain instances, a product's price does reflect it's utility. This is the case when there are not various similar substitutes to a product available on the market. Take for instance official SAT practice tests, released by the board that runs the SAT test, a test high school students are required to take to gain acceptance into various colleges in the United States. These tests are purchased by students to prepare for the test and get a gauge of what the actual test will be like. Because these practice tests are released by the same board that runs the SATs they closely mirror the experience of the actual test, a feeling that other companies cannot produce because as they do not create the official test. Thus, in this case because only one organization is able to make the product, price will be a reflection of the product’s function, as it is the only product available that fulfils the function at task.

Thus, we cannot simply assert in all cases that the price of an object does not reflect its value, or utility. This will only be the case when we are considering high-end brand name products that provide the same function that similar and considerably cheaper products also provide. This is apparent in the case of the Gucci handbags versus those made by a less well-known designer. Although the Gucci bags are much more expensive, the value they provide is the same, as they both are effective at being handbags. However, when considering items, for which there are no similar alternatives, the price of these objects are often a reflection of their value. Consider the official SAT practice tests that only one company is able to produce, and thus they are no cheaper alternatives for. In this case price does reflect value, because it is the only product that is able to provide a particular function. Ultimately price will not reflect value for a product when there are many similar and differently priced substitutes for that product; however if there are no other alternatives available for a product, price will reflect that object’s value.

 

Glad that you like the ripple.org idea.

 

You're welcome.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of some clarity and complexity of thought.

 

Some good examples, however, you can further strengthen the essay by briefly covering an alternative to Gucci, and also explain why Gucci is so expensive when it provides the same utility as handbags from other companies.

 

I feel this essay will be scored a:

JKLMNOPQ/RST

[PastaInhaler]

-Clicked-

 

The study of history is more an art than a science.

 

 

The study of history relies on deducing things from observations and artifacts collected from the era. This is very similar to what a scientist does. However there is a major difference between a historian and a scientist. The historian provides us with a theory based on his beliefs and experiences. This makes his theory a subjective theory which has no way of being proved. We of the modern era can never really know what the people of the past were thinking and what their motives were, we can only deduce from the writings and art of observers. This subjective nature of the study of history places it in the category of art.

 

We all know the famous story of Ceaser, the man who turned Rome into a dictatorship. He overthrew his fellow friend and politician and took over the roman provinces. Historians argue as to the reason for his betrayal, many accuse Ceaser’s friends to have provoked him. Other’s say that it was Ceaser’s intention to take over Rome from the moment he joined the military. Both sides have much evidence to support their argument. But no matter how convincing the evidence may be, one can never really guess what was going in the mind of Ceaser. As we have learned from modern science, that the human consciousness is a weird place, and even more doubting is the fact that many chemicals known as hormones and even the sub consciousness has much effect on our actions. Because of the questioning nature of the study of history, it is very difficult to see it as being part of science.

 

Science is the use of observations to prove a theory. This theory may only be proven granted that there is tremendous amount of evidence supporting it. One branch of history involves with the use of DNA technology to trace back genealogy to find the true ancestors of a person. This branch uses science and uses the techniques of science to verify a theory. A theory which is produced by a historian. The art portion of study of history provides us with many theories, while the scientific portion of history helps us to verify the theories. It can be said that the study of history is a form of art because it is subjective. However, when objective measures are used in this study of history, it becomes a form of science.

 

The End

 

Thanks for grading it,

dam my essay looks so tiny.. only 366 words. Should I have added anotehr example?

 

You're welcome.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of some clarity of thought.

Demonstrates some difficulty in responding to the tasks.

 

Be sure not to use 'The End' on the actual essay.

 

Another example would not have helped as much as if you used a more concrete example in your second example rather than just using DNA in genealogy in general. I think what the creators of this prompt wanted was more of how can the nature of each of the arts and sciences, in their approach be used to study history. Those in the arts can be objective just as much as in the sciences, but what are the subtleties that distinguish one from the other? You can think of science as being more methodical, of adhering to strict protocols, devising hypotheses, and testing them under rigorously controlled conditions. Elements of art and science can overlap, and they don't necessarily exist in stark contrast to each other, nor in an opposing and irreconcilable dichotomy.

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKLM/NOPQRST

[PastaInhaler]

<clicked>

Education comes not from books but from practical experience.

Write a unified essay in which you perform the following tasks. Explain what you think the above statement means. Describe a specific situation in which books might educate students better than practical experience. Discuss what you think determines when practical experience provides a better education than books do.

 

 

Education is taught in a variety of ways. Sometimes the most effective way of teaching is through books while other times, practical experience proves to be far more effective. Practical expericences, in the context of education, is the hands on use of tools related to a field of work. Books is essentially the theory based approach to explaining concepts. Furthermore, the prompt means that books teach students better than practical experience. An example is the study of mathematics. Many universities have programs dedicated to the in-dept study of calculas, statistics, and other theory based maths. Mathematics often uses theoretical abstract symbols and variables in order to explain complex relationships and the connections between them. To understand these symbols, universities ask students to purchase large text books filled with examples and definitions of variables.Additionally, little class time is given to practical application of the mathematics because the feild does not require students to be proficient in applying the concepts in order to be sucessful in their career. In this case, because the study of mathematics is involved heavily in theoretical concepts, the best way of teaching students is through books and not practical experience.

 

 

However, in the case where hands on experience is need to suceed in a particular activity, practical experience teaches better than books. Take for example carpentry. Colleges around the country offer carpentry course to students interesting in becoming carpenters. The curriculum is based mainly on workshop classes and hours of hands on work with wood with little emphasis on theory based learning from books. Since the occupation of carpentry is itself physically involved, students learn best by being physically involved with the materials they will be using during their career. Colleges understand this and put little emphasis on teaching out of text books. In this case, because carpentry is based more on hands on work rather than theoretical concepts, practical experience is the best way of teaching students.

 

 

Whether or not practical experience or books provides the best education depends on the types of career the student is pursuing. If the student is pursuing a career in a theory based field, such as in the case of mathematics, then books are the better mode of education. However, if the student is pursuing a career in a physical and hands on occupation, such as in the case of carpentry, then practical experience is the better mode of education. It should be noted that some occupations involve both theory and practical applications. An example is surgery. Surgery requires students to study the theoretical aspects of the respiratory systems, circulatory system, and excretory system of the human body from text books. Additionally, in order for a surgeon to actually carry out surgeries, practical applications involving how to use tools and how to cut in precise manor is equally necessary.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Demonstrates difficulty in responding to the tasks.

 

Problems with organization and integration of ideas.

 

Task#1 was not properly addressed, and you have inverted the meaning of the prompt. Task#2 was completed, but not in the intended order. It would be best not to add a new example in the final sentences of the essay that provides an argument that weakens the underlying theme of the essay.

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKL/MNOPQRST

[PastaInhaler]

--clicked--

 

In politics, campaign promises are seldom kept after the election is won.

 

In a democratic society, leaders are elected by the general public in which everyone has a voice. As such, it is of no surprise that candidates strive to appease the majority of voters as possible during their electoral campaign in order to harbor the most support possible. This is usually done by way of proposing promises that he or she will fulfill if elected to power. However, it is not uncommon to see these promises, which can be termed “empty promises,” unfulfilled after the election is won. A prime example of this is when Barack Obama, now the President of the United States, was running for presidency against Hillary Clinton. During his campaign, Obama vowed to improve the health care system, making it equally accessbible to everyone. This promise offered to the American public during his campaign found great favour amongst them. It gave citizens a new life to look forward to, and thus, Obama was voted into presidency. However, from the day of his appointment till now, this promise has been fulfilled. Several complications have arisen that Obama could not foresee. One of them being the economic recession which devastated the US economy, making radical improvements to the health care system out of reach. As can be seen, Obama’s race for presidency is a definitive example of where promises become “empty promises,” unfulfilled, and before long, may be forgotten.

 

In contrast, there are times in which candidates actually fulfill their promises made to the electorate during their campaign. During Steven Harper’s run to be Prime Minister of Canada, he vowed to the Canadian citizens to reduce the Goods and Services Tax (GST) which had previously been introduced under Brian Mulroney’s government. This tax effectively took 7% off of all sales and would become a source of revenue for the Canadian government. Upon its enactment, there was mass disapproval across the nation. Realizing this, Jean Chretien, during his time as Prime Minister, even tried to abolish this tax, unfortunately, without success. However, Harper, made a promise to the Canadians during his campaign that he would reduce this tax from its original 7% to 6% and then further down to 5%. It is of no surprise that this promise appealed to the mass majority of Canadians and thus, Harper was voted to become Canada’s next Prime Minister. During his term, Harper did in fact fulfill his promise and this is why, to this day, GST is only at 5% instead of its original 7%.

 

As can be seen, during political campaigns, several promises are made by candidates in hopes of gaining favor of the majority. However, there are times when these promises are not fulfilled and there are times when they are. What determines whether these promises are fulfilled depends on the scope of the promise. Promises, such as Obama’s, to improve health care are a nationwide radicalization that involves many factors than just the approval of a bill. Factors such as the health of the economy, funding for the enactment of a new health care plan, the type of plan, etc.. must all be considered. Unfortunately, for Obama, the economic recession effectively dampened the health of the economy, making the introduction of a new health care plan out of reach. In contrast, promises that do not involve several factors which need to be considered can be fulfilled. In Harper’s case, the lowering of the GST tax from 7% to 5% involved only the enactment of a bill. Once passed, the law would come into effect and the change will have been made. This was exactly the case for Harper, and thus, he was able to fulfill his promise to Canadians.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of some clarity and depth of thought.

 

Demonstrates some proficiency in responding to the tasks.

However, an essay reader may take issue with the ideas in task#3. It would follow from your example, that certain extrinsic factors were present that made it difficult for Obama to enact his plan for healthcare reform. You can keep your ideas more clear and concise if you kept to this idea. There were unforseen circumstances in the financial health of the country in which the leader wished to execute his new laws. Such circumstances were evident in the Obama example, but not in the Harper example.

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKLMNO/PQRST

[PastaInhaler]

--clicked--

 

The role of technology should be to improve human life, but not to affect human values.

 

Throughout history, advancements in technology have consistently improved the quality of human life without affecting human values. What was once impossible to achieve, is now possible through technology. For example, today, we can instantly talk to anyone in the world due to the introduction of social networking sites and radical improvements in medical care are attributed to the invention of Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI). Evidently, technology has improved human life. A definitive example can be seen with the recent invention of what is termed the “smart phone.” These phones allow owners to perform various tasks on it simultaneously such as email, listen to music, watch videos, and play games- all without taking away from the basic function of making a call. Our lives have been made more efficient and convenient by the invention of these “smart phones,” as now, many people can do business on the road due to the ability to be able to check emails, students can study on their phone due to the ability of phones to be able to display documents, and children can play games. It is evident, that by the introduction of these “smart phones,” human life has been improved in ways of efficiency and convenience.

 

In contrast, there are cases in which the role of technology not only improves human life but also affects human values. Human values are usually instilled in people by way of religion and become the main basis by which individuals make certain decisions. If a decision conflicts with their personal values, they may oppose it and similarly, if it is in line with their values, they may support it. A prime example of a situation in which the role of technology affects human values is the invention of drugs and medical procedures that allowed females to get abortions. Abortion, a widely debated topic, is a view that, depending on one’s values, one would support or disprove of. In fact, abortion is such a widely contested topic that even during the recent presidential elections, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama used the support or disapproval of abortion as one of their platform policies. Those who do not support abortion because of their personal values, such as religion, would see the invention of these procedures as affecting their human value. For example, it is argued that those who are victims of rape should be allowed to undergo the abortion procedure. However, if one who is originally opposed to the idea of abortion is a victim of rape, the invention of abortion procedures will effectively affect their human values. In contrast, one whose human vales support the idea of abortion, may immediately undergo abortion and be very pleased with the invention of this procedure as her life has now been improved. Evidently, invention of new technology can not only improve human life, but also affect human values.

 

What then determines whether technology only improves human life or if it also affects human values as well? If the role of technology is primarily to make life more efficient and convenient, it will only improve human life. In the case of the invention of “smart phones,” life was improved as emailing, wathching videos, and playing games could all be done on one device. However, if the role of technology goes beyond making life more efficient and convenient but instead, crosses into an area that may conflict with one’s religion, then this technology would affect human values. In the case of the invention of new abortion procedures, many people are opposed to abortion due to values instilled into them through their religion. As such, through the invention of these procedures would affect their human values.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of some coherence and depth of thought.

 

Demonstrates some proficiency in responding to the tasks. For task#3, you will have to be a little more explicit with what you think determines whether or not technology should affect human values. It is not evident that this task was fully addressed.

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKLMNO/PQRST

[PastaInhaler]

-clicked-

 

Education makes everyone equal.

 

Write a unified essay in which you perform the following tasks. Explain what you think the above statement means. Describe a specific situation in which education does not make everyone equal. Discuss what you think determines whether or not education makes everyone equal.

 

Education serves an important role in society by teaching students valuable knowledge and skills in order to foster knowledgeable and creative minds. The type of education' date=' however, differs under distinct circumstances. For example, parents teaching their children about values and scruples can be regarded as education. Additionally, the knowledge acquired in school for various subjects is the common definition of education.

 

Some forms of education, such as those delivered in public schools, aim to teach students from a specific curriculum regarding the workings of the world. For example, Marc Garneau Collegiate Institute in Toronto has exceptional departments in science and mathematics that promote creativity and help students grow into talented and brilliant individuals. Education provided in a public setting is accessible to everyone and offers fundamental knowledge that is widely agreed-upon in society. The knowledge gained in a public setting is often objective and minimally prone to bias. As a result, in this context, students receive equal education regarding facts that are rarely disputable, making everyone receiving the education equal.

 

While some forms of education make everyone equal, education provided in a private setting often fosters certain values and spiritual beliefs. For instance, the faith-based Islamic School of Toronto not only educates children about the workings of the world as in public schools, but also aspires to educate students about faith and spirituality. These concepts of discussion are personal and subjective, thus prone to bias. For example, students in Islamic school are taught to respect the opinions, privacy and security of others, while protecting the religion from harm. However, owing to misinterpretations of the text of the Holy Quran, some people believe different values and do not act in accordance with the teachings of the religion. Hence, the education received in private schools is often subjective and open to interpretation, making everyone receiving the education unequal.

 

In conclusion, education is an integral part of society as it allows its members to integrate into and contribute to society. Education that is objective and minimally susceptible to bias, such as the knowledge acquired in public schools, makes everyone equal. This form of education is often considered to provide facts and teach indisputable concepts. Conversely, education that is subjective and prone to bias and interpretation, such as the knowledge provided in private schools, does not make everyone equal. While this form of education hopes to teach certain values and scruples, there is room for interpretation within each student. As a result, education in such an environment does not make everyone equal.

 

Thanks![/quote']

 

You're welcome.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of some clarity and depth of thought.

 

Demonstrates proficiency in responding to the tasks. However, you should attempt to be more explicit with task#3 in discussing what you think determines whether or not education makes everyone equal.

 

I feel this essay will be scored an:

JKLMNO/PQRST

[PastaInhaler]

--clicked--

 

Only those politicians who have learned the art of compromise can achieve their goal

 

In a democratic society, politicians are voted into power by their consituents who all have an equal voice. As such, it is of no surprise that the main goal of candidates during their election campaign is to harbor the support of the majority of voters. Sometimes this may involve introducing policies and promises that may contradict with what one personally believes, or even the views of citizens, in order to achieve one's political goal. Thus, many politicians, in their attempts to achieve their goals, must compromise. A prime example of this was seen in Steven Harper's run to become Prime Minister of Canada. His main campaign platform was to reduce the Goods and Services Tax (GST), which had intitially been introduced by Brian Mulroney during his time as Prime Minister, from its original 7% to 6% and then further down to 5%. The introduction of the GST was met with mass displeasement amongst Canadians as it would effectively add an additional 7% to all sale prices of items, effectively making Canadians pay more than the listing price. Realizing how Canadians felt about the GST, Harper vowed to reduce the tax during his campaign. However, in making this promise, it was well known that Harper would have to compromise on the economic budget for Canada. By reducing the GST, a source of revenue for the government, it would effectively put Canada into more debt that it already is. Despite this knowledge, Harper decided to make this compromise to please his voters. As a result, he found great favor amongst Canadians and achieved his politcal goal, becoming the next Prime Minister of CAnada, at the expense of the Canadian budget.

 

However, there are cases when politicans can achieve their political goal without compromising. These politicans believe achieving their goal is solely within their control and thus, compromising and relying on others is not effective. A definitive example of this was the enactment of the War Measure Act in 1970 during the October Crisis by Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau. During this time, Quebec Nationalists and members of the FLQ, who believed in the seperation of Quebec from Canada, endgangered Canadians by placing explosives in mailboxes, kidnapping, and even commiting murder. Citizens of Quebec began to fear a militant uprising against the government of Canada. As the situation in Quebec continued to spiral out of control, Trudeau immediately enacted the War Measures Act. This act effectively curbed all freedom from Canadian citizens and extended the powers of the police to the point where they could arrest and detain anyone suspected of being involved with the FLQ without charge. Up until the time Trudeau decided to impose the WMA, many Canadians disagreed with his resolution to this crisis claiming that individual rights should never be curbed. Despite the public outcry against the WMA, Trudeau continued according to his plan and imposed the WMA. Ultimately, it led to the end of the crisis and renewal of public safety in the streets of Quebec. As can be seen, in this situation, Trudeau did not compromise to achieve his politacal goal of ending the reign of terror by the FLQ.

 

Whether politicans should practice the art of compromise to achieve their political goals or not depends on whether their goal can be achieved alone or if it requires the aid of others. In the case of Harper's goal in becoming the Prime Minister of Canada, he relied on the support of his voters. As a result, compromise was necessary in order to please them and harbour their support. This is why he promised to reduce the Goods and Services Tax despite the well known effects of the damage it would have on the economic budget of Canada. On the other hand, compromise is not required when the goal to be achieved does not rely on the aid of others. Trudeau's goal was the end the civil unrest caused the Quebec Nationalist and the FLQ in Quebec. This goal could be achieved by him alone and did not depend on the support of Canadian citizens. Thus, Trudeau was able to impose the War Measures Act without compromising to Canadians. Ultimately, his goal was achieved and the October Crisis was subdued.

 

Thanks for clicking. Appreciated.

 

Adequate control of language.

Evidence of clarity and depth of thought.

Demonstrates proficiency in responding to the tasks.

 

Your examples are sufficient in supporting your arguments.

 

I feel this essay will be scored a:

JKLMNOPQRST

[Asta]

-clicked-

 

Thanks Pasta!

 

Progress often complicates as much as it simplifies.

 

In the past century, the human race has seen more intellectual and technological changes then ever before. Indeed, this progress has changed the way that we interact with and understand the world in dramatic ways. Progress can be defined as change towards improvement, and it is synonymous with advancement. Sadly, this progress often complicates as much as it simplifies. As our scientific understanding has advanced, complicated new theories and projects have become prevalent. Take, for example, quantum theory. Quantum theory represents a huge advancement in the physical sciences, but the majority of the human population does not understand this theory because it is too complicated.

 

Examples of progress complicating as much as it simplifies can also be seen in the world of technology. For example, the personal computer is a very complicated piece of technology. Further, knowledge of how to operate a computer is becoming progressively more necessary in modern society. Indeed, the computer is now a necessary tool in communication, commerce, education and entertainment. For some members of society, the computer is too complicated to be used proficiently, and this has negatively impacted their lives. A lack of technical proficiency has led to complications and frustration. Indeed, sometimes progress, be it scientific or technological, can complicate as much as it simplifies.

 

Thankfully, progress can also lead to simplicity and ease. The car maker Lexus has recently released a new model of car that parallel parks for the driver at the flip of a button. Parallel parking is the bane of many drivers, and this feature can greatly simplify the parking process. This can reduce stress and save time. This technological progress makes a certain aspect of life easier rather than more complicated. Indeed, technological advancements can simplify life.

 

In some cases, progress complicates life, and in other cases, progress simplifies things. Whether progress leads to complications or simplifications can be determined by evaluating how technically challenging or mentally complex the required new process is. Quantum theory is mentally complex, so quantum theory is very complicated. The operation of a personal computer is a technically complex process, and as such, this technology has complicated the lives of some users. Lexus' new parallel parking feature is very simple to use, so this progress has served to simplify the lives of drivers. Regardless of metal complexity or technical challenge, new processes and theories can be learned and mastered. Until this mastery occurs, progress often complicates as much as it simplifies. Since progress is defined as change, the rate of mastery may never be able to keep speed with the rate of progress, and novel concepts and inventions may perpetually baffle some people.

[atesme]

-clicked- (by the way, Ripple is awesome)

 

Television turns even the most significant events into entertainment.

 

 

Television is watched by people all over the world. The different types of programming that are available today are extensive. From documentaries to reality television to daytime soap operas, we can get a lot of satisfaction from watching TV. However, one of the most important things that television offers us today is the 6 o’clock news. For the most part, news broadcasts are intended to keep the general public informed about the different events that are occurring in the world. However, oftentimes television tries to put a spin on the news. They want to make the news seem like an interesting story, because then we will be more likely to watch it for entertainment as well as for information. For example, the recent wedding of Prince William and Kate is, of course, newsworthy. It is natural that people all around the world should want to know about the nupitals. However, television broadcasts take that interest to a new level, giving us intricate details of Kate’s dress, telling us about her ring, and even showing footage of the wedding ceremony. In fact, I remember hankering down with a group of friends one evening eating chips and watching broadcasts of the royal wedding. In this case, television has taken interest in this event to another level. The coverage for the wedding was definitely more for entertainment’s sake than for information’s.

 

Whilst watching Will and Kate tie the knot was definitely fun, there are some events that television stations simply cannot make entertaining, regardless of how much explicit footage they show. This is due to the nature of the event. Nobody, for example, enjoyed watching footage of the 9/11 attacks. Although we were all glued to our television screens for a good week following the bombing, the reason for tuning into the news stations over and over again was not for enjoyment. Rather, we wanted information. We wanted to know what had happened, what was going to happen, what the government was going to do about it, whether there was any more danger… etc. Here, television provided us with a channel of information, and it was seized onto solely for that reason. Nobody lounged around in front of the TV with a bucket of popcorn watching the 9/11 attacks. It was simply not the kind of news with which one could do such a thing. It was too depressing, too scary, too shockingly uncomfortable to think about.

 

The determining factor which allows us to watch a news show for fun as well as for information is embedded in the nature of the story. If we are watching the reporter speak about a light hearted event, one that we are happy to hear has happened, then extensive coverage of the event has the ability to turn a news story into a television sensation. This is why we all watched the royal wedding with such avid attention. If, however, the event to speak of is one that shocks, horrifies, and makes us feel naturally uncomfortable and unhappy, then no amount of reporting will be able to dull that feeling and wake in us an enjoyment for watching the horrors unfold on the screen. Rather, in such a situation we watch the television with anxiety, hoping minute by minute to hear of good news. In conclusion, while television reporting might try to turn news into entertainment in order to garner more viewership, it can only be successful with certain kinds of stories.

[pacemaker]

-Clicked-

 

 

People’s first priority should be financial security.

 

In modern society, money plays a huge role. It is commonly believed that money makes the world go around. Thus, it is important for an individual to consider financial security as his/her first priority. The term financial security is used to refer to a state of economic stability on an individual level. More specifically, an individual is said to be financially secure when he/she has acquired a decent amount of money for future use (savings for retirement, children's education, future purchases etc), is not in debt and has a secure job to ensure a steady flow of income on a regular basis. More specifically, financial security should be the first priority for adults since they are considered to be old enough to work and to make appropriate decisions. For example, if an adult wishes to establish a family, it is very important that he/she is financially secure. Having a family and possibly becoming a parent places huge responsibilties on the individual. He/she is considered to be responsible to care for the children and to ensure that their needs are being met. As such, an adult is responsible for himself/herself as well as the dependents. In this situations, financial security should be the first priority.

 

In contrast, financial security should not be the first priority for children and youth under the age of 18 since they are not considered to be old enough to work or to be able to make appropriate decisions. For example, for an individual under the age of 18, the first priority should be school and family instead of financial security. It is the responsibility of the parents and caregivers to provide for children and to ensure that their needs are being met. As such, it is not necessary for a child or youth to view financial security as their first priority. It is also important to note that when an individual is under tha age of 18, they are not resonsible for caring for themselves or for others. Thus, it is not necessary for them to view financial security is being one of significant importance.

 

In conclusion, financial security should be the first priority for adults since they are considered to be old enough to work and to make appropriate decisions. They are also thought to be responsible for themselves and for any dependents they may have. In contrast, financial security should not be the first priority for children and youth under the age of 18. In most societies, such individuals are not considered to be old enough to be capable to work or to be able to make appropriate decisions. They are also not considered to be resposible for caring for themselves or for others. Thus, financial security does not need to be their first priority.

 

Thanks PastaInhaler!

 

P.S. I wasn't sure what kind of examples to use in such a prompt as it seems too vague and no particular/specific example comes to mind. Any feedback regarding that would be much appreciated. Thanks!

[pacemaker]

-Clicked-

 

Successful politicians are ones that are motivated more by practical considerations than moral values.

 

Politicians consist of individuals that have either been voted, selected or appointed to their given position by the citizens or another governing party/official. In most democratic societies, the duty of the politician is to serve as the voice for the people. A politician is one who is a great leader that is able to lead the country forward in time of peace as well as during times of war or other crisis. More specifically, success of a politician greatly relies on their ability to lead the country forward during the times of crisis. Thus, during such times, it is important for a politician to be motivated more by practical concerns rather than by moral values. For example, President of the United States, Barack Obama came into power after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the country. In order for him to be successful, he needs to be able to consider the concerns of the citizens of the United States and continue the efforts to fight terrorism in order to ensure that such an event does not repeat itself. In the light of practical concerns for national security and for answers to the events that happened in the past (i.e. 9/11 attack), President Obama had to make the decision to send the American army to Pakistan in search for Osama Bin Laden, the mastermind behind the terrorist attacks. Osama Bin Laden was found in Pakistan and was killed by the American army. Moral values would normally prevent one to take such a decision of killing another human being. However, in this situation where the national security, justice and peace for a huge group of individuals is involved, practical considerations play an important role in a politicians' decision making process. This accomplishment made under the government led by President Obama will serve a very important role in his continued success.

 

In contrast, it is not always necessary for a successful politician to be motivated more by practical considerations. A successful politician can also be motivated by moral values. For example, Mahatma Gandhi was involved in the uprising of politics in India during the time of the British Rule. Practical considerations to attain freedom for the nation as a whole were important, however, Mahatma Gandhi made his efforts based on moral values. He used the route of non-violence to get his point accross to the British Empire and was greatly successful. In 1947, his non-violent protests against the British Empire played a major role in the independance of India. This illustrates that his success was primarily driven by motivation due to moral values. Note that in this case, India was not under threat to its national security and the lives of thousands of people was not explicitly at stake. Citizens of India were being suppressed and were not free to make their own decisions. Hence, this is not considered as a situation of war or crisis.

 

In conclusion, some politicians that have been successful at their jobs are greatly motivated by practical consideration rather than by moral values. This is especially the case during wartime or times of crisis where practical considerations with regards to the safety of the citizens and overall national security are of utmost importance. Such concerns can lead a politician to make tough decisions that moral values would otherwise not allow. Moreover, it is important to note that the success of a politician is heavily dependant upon the way in which he/she leads the country through the tough time, such as those seen during a war or times of crisis. During the time of crisis, it is important for a politician to be motivated by practical concerns. This was clearly illustrated by the example of President Barack Obama making th tough decisions to send the American Army in search of terrorist Osama Bin Laden who was later executed during this effort. On the other hand, it is possible for a successful politician to be motivated by moral values such as that illustrated in the case of Mahatma Gandhi. He became successful by being motivated by his moral values and followed a route of non-violence during the fight for independance in India. Moral values can play a major role when there is no explicit threat to the safety of the citizens of a given nation such as those seen in India in the 1940's.

 

Thanks!

[in_hindsight]

-Clicked-

 

In politics, money equals power.

 

Describe a specific political situation in which money might not equal power. Discuss what you think determines when money equals power in politics and when it does not.

 

It is the nature of politics to force individuals to compete with each other. Before an individual is elected to a political position, they must organize and undergo extensive political campaigns to in an attempt to persuade the public to vote for them. Often, these campaigns are viewed as expensive promotions which may or may not provide a return on their original investment. Political victors are often those individuals with the most elaborate campaigns. Therefore, money affords power to these individuals because they will be able to fund such campaigns. For example, following the 2011 conservative victory in the Canadian federal election it was found that they spent nearly $100 million on their political campaign. This amount was nearly double that of the liberals and quadruple that of independent political parties. Political analysts attributed the conservative victory to their extensive campaigning. These campaigns helped enhance the presence of the conservatives within Canadian neighborhoods and help dilute the presence of rivaling political parties.

 

Conversely, there are situations during which money does not afford power. Such situations typically arise when a political party or a politician has already been elected. For example, prior to entering politics Arnold Schwarzenegger was a successful movie star earning a multimillion dollar paycheck. In the early 2000’s Arnold became governor of California. By the nature of this position, this afforded him only the ability to influence state policy. On the other hand Barack Obama, the president of the United States, earns a salary of $400,000 but is commander in chief and has much more political power than governor Schwarzenegger. This is because the position of president affords him with greater privileges and power than the position of governor. Therefore, despite earning more money than Barack Obama, Arnold Schwarzenegger has less political power due to the nature of his political position.

 

Consequently, in politics, money only affords power under certain circumstances. If a political party is in direct competition with rivaling parties during a political election, the party with the most money will often come out victorious. This was seen during the 2011 Federal Canadian election when the wealthy conservative party was able to conduct elaborate political campaigns to influence the opinion of the general public. However, if an individual has already been elected, their political position grants them power. Even though Arnold Schwarzenegger is a multimillionaire, he has less influence than President Barack Obama because the position of governor affords less political power than the position of president.

[charty]

-clicked-

 

I did this in during the aamc practice exam 3R. First practice run, time limits on and such.

 

An understanding of the past is necessary for solving problems of the present.

 

 

Humans are often victim to their past mistakes. To make a mistake should be to learn from it. After making the mistake of delegalization of alcohol in the United States, it is now understood the financial consequences as well as resource wastage in making drugs illegal. It is because of this knowledge of the past that we are now able to begin to understand why the legalization of marijuana may be useful in increasing resources as well as lost money through legalized sales of marijuana. Through history this is usually how we have come to make increasingly intelligent decisions. This is seen through building homes with certain materials and upon finding that a particular form of wood is not insulating enough, it is learned that a new wood form must be used in order to provide further insulation to the home. It is through these past mistakes and understanding why something has happened that one is able to to solve a future problem.

 

Yet, understanding the past is not exclusively the only way to solve a current or future problem. This is evident through the use of effective critical analysis and decision-making. When presented with a problem, it is often wise and prudent to develop a list of avenues to approach the problem. Upon examination of each of these choices, it would become increasingly evident that some of these my not be feasible due to a lack of money or lack of resources. From these possible remaining choices, you would be able to sample each of the solutions. From the pilot trial of choices, then choose the one that would be the best solution. This process is rather efficient, yet does not require any previous knowledge of the past. This process is evident in looking at the problem of a lack of personal transportation to and from work, with possible choices including several vehicles, public transit and a bicycle.

 

The past does need to be understood in certain circumstances in order to make intelligent decisions regarding future problems. The evidence of this is clear throughout many points of history, including the delegalization of alcohol and the current issue in legalizing marijuana. It is also the case that to solve a problem, you do not need to know the past. Human inspiration may serve to show the solution to a problem, just as decision-making skills and critical analysis may lead to a solution as well, evidenced through personal choice in transportation. It is known, however, that in knowing you couldn't afford payments for your previous car, that purchasing a new vehicle may not be an appropriate solution to the problem. This case is evidence that while understanding the past is not entirely necessary to solve a future problem, it will often lead to a more educated decision than without that knowledge.