anxious_101 Posted July 23, 2011 Report Share Posted July 23, 2011 Sounds like boobs to me but this is peer-reviewed science, apparently http://healthland.time.com/2011/07/06/penis-size-it-may-be-written-in-the-length-of-his-fingers/ I must be an exception to this rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD2019_A Posted July 23, 2011 Report Share Posted July 23, 2011 Why would someone even think about that experiment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medguy5367 Posted July 23, 2011 Report Share Posted July 23, 2011 They did not even measure erect length - only flaccid + stretched flaccid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obi Posted July 23, 2011 Report Share Posted July 23, 2011 They did say that stretched correlates to erect length. I dunno what kind of coefficient it has that for them to claim it to be sufficient, but they do at least explain why they didn't use erect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
future_doc Posted July 23, 2011 Report Share Posted July 23, 2011 They did say that stretched correlates to erect length. The correlationship is an unsubstantiated assumption that may be false - and this alone undermines the alleged findings/conclusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.