Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums

LOR Choice for Carms


Guest tongtongcuty

Recommended Posts

Guest tongtongcuty

Greetings. For most programs in Canada, 3 is required number of LOR. If you have 2 letters from your own institution, and two from US schools, how will you assign them for the Carms? Ideally, you will use all 2 from your own institution when you apply there. But when you apply other institution in Canada whereas you have no electives done there, will it look bad if you use 2 home-school institution letters and one US letter? Or should it be just one home institution and two US letters?

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tongtongcuty

I don't think you understand. Being a US grad only allows two months rotations in Canada, in which both are used in the institution I want to apply.

As a return, two letters were generated. Using those letters for this institution is a must, but as for other institutions in Canada, will they consider negatively by the fact you did not rotate there and using two letters from the other school?

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tongtongcuty

Thanks for the quick reply. So which way is a better tactic: use two from the only canadian institution that you had done elective to apply other canadian institutions or just one with another two US letters?

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think there's a difference between an US or a CAN referee, they must be both considered reliable here, as compared to an IMG (I mean, *real* IMG from outside of North America) getting a letter from a third-world country. (no offense to those countries though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think there's a difference between an US or a CAN referee, they must be both considered reliable here, as compared to an IMG (I mean, *real* IMG from outside of North America) getting a letter from a third-world country. (no offense to those countries though)

 

Right, because North Americans are so much more articulate than those damn referees from 'third-world' countries. Wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen great foreign docs, and foreign docs that I think will eventually kill someone due to their combined incompetence and hubris. I've seen the same with domestic docs, but the worst case I've seen is a doc that trained in one of those countries for which stigma exist. Guy is still a resident but man, one of these days someone is going to die.

 

I get what you mean...

 

Drifting away from original post now...

 

Yet, somehow this guy managed to land a residency in Canada, whereas other CSAs who did not train in third-world countries are snubbed. I've heard stories in the Maritimes too, of such docs. But in the cases I've heard, the residents/docs are usually fully trained from their native country which is why they were given priority over a freshly graduated CSA who is essentially Cdn.

 

Pfft....I don't even know if my post makes sense, I'm at work and exhausted!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you mean...

 

Drifting away from original post now...

 

Yet, somehow this guy managed to land a residency in Canada, whereas other CSAs who did not train in third-world countries are snubbed. I've heard stories in the Maritimes too, of such docs. But in the cases I've heard, the residents/docs are usually fully trained from their native country which is why they were given priority over a freshly graduated CSA who is essentially Cdn.

 

Pfft....I don't even know if my post makes sense, I'm at work and exhausted!

 

Hi wildcard

I am not here to make any judgement or whatsoever.

I NEVER said CMG is more competent that IMG or vice versa, needless to mention all my pleasant experiences with IMGs

 

I am here just to tell the fact, that selection committee often tend to give less credit to LoR from outside of North America

this fact, while maybe not politically correct, is NOT necessarily MY point of view

 

I might have thought too much, but I did smell sarcasm from your replies.

 

Peace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi wildcard

I am not here to make any judgement or whatsoever.

I NEVER said CMG is more competent that IMG or vice versa, needless to mention all my pleasant experiences with IMGs

 

I agree, you didn't. I didn't say you did, or did I imply that.

 

I am here just to tell the fact, that selection committee often tend to give less credit to LoR from outside of North America

this fact, while maybe not politically correct, is NOT necessarily MY point of view

 

I get your point...and I agree that selection committees most likely tend to favor a North American referee. But 'outside of North America' doesn't automatically = 'third-world countries' where in fact, most people have better English language skills that many North Americans whose first (and only) language is English - this is not my point of view, its a fact.

 

Furthermore, some IMGs are actually Cdn born and have LoRs from non-third world countries like the UK, but those letters are still not looked upon favorably b/c they are not Cdn - this IS my point of view.

 

I might have thought too much, but I did smell sarcasm from your replies.

 

You have an accurate sense of smell.

 

In any case, I think the OP has got a decent response to his query so I think we can let it rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...