zdh Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Article I know this pertains to the US healthcare system, and I don't know if Canada has anything like this at the provincial or federal level, but I thought it would make for some interesting discussion. Do you feel records of disciplinary action against physicians should be made available to the public (in general, not specifically in the US or in Canada), and if so, should physician names be published or withheld? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jochi1543 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 If a doctor is found guilty of violating professional conduct, it's definitely published here in Alberta. You can find a list of docs with past disciplinary actions on the College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta website. Also, if you search for a doc on there, it will say whether there's been any action or practice limits against them. I recently looked up a bunch of docs and found that one doc my boyfriend has seen a few times is due for a hearing (a stage to which very few complaints make, maybe 1% IIRC). He currently has practice limitations regarding female patients. It certainly put what I had perceived as his general douchiness into perspective. Unfortunately, it's not like we have a lot of other options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
future_doc Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Do you feel records of disciplinary action against physicians should be made available to the public (in general, not specifically in the US or in Canada), and if so, should physician names be published or withheld? Absolutely with the physician names published. This is for the protection of the public so they are "informed". Anything less makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Hood Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Absolutely with the physician names published. This is for the protection of the public so they are "informed". Anything less makes no sense. +1. 10chars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.