Jump to content
Premed 101 Forums

NAQ changes from year to year


Recommended Posts

Hey friend!

10 points is a quite the jump and truthfully, I'd be wary about banking on such an increase. With that said though, if you peruse through some of the interview threads, I'm sure you'll see 5-10 point jumps (and unfortunately, in some cases, decreases) in NAQ scores across cycles. I added four new slots to my application this year (v. service-focused with emphasis on marginalized populations) and experienced a 3 point jump this cycle. I did completely rewrite a lot of my previous entries, though. You never really know, tbh.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just chiming in, between my application from 4th year UG and 5th, there was a 3 point drop and I added in additional research entries but no other extracurriculars. Between 5th and my first year out of UG, I had an 8 point increase. I added in all the extracurriculars I did, even if I thought they were pointless, and changed my writing style. This year I probably went up another 2 to make cutoffs. Writing style completely changed. I had 10 rewritten versions, edited by 6+ individuals who are all in medicine at different levels. 

IMO, writing style is worth much more than the activity itself. The difference in entries between my first attempt and my fourth is the 4 new jobs I've had (and joining a vball league) but no additional extracurriculars or entries. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, chiynadoll said:

Just chiming in, between my application from 4th year UG and 5th, there was a 3 point drop and I added in additional research entries but no other extracurriculars. Between 5th and my first year out of UG, I had an 8 point increase. I added in all the extracurriculars I did, even if I thought they were pointless, and changed my writing style. This year I probably went up another 2 to make cutoffs. Writing style completely changed. I had 10 rewritten versions, edited by 6+ individuals who are all in medicine at different levels. 

IMO, writing style is worth much more than the activity itself. The difference in entries between my first attempt and my fourth is the 4 new jobs I've had (and joining a vball league) but no additional extracurriculars or entries. 

Totally agree. I go back and read my old pre-interview rejection apps and they're cringey scientific-report style at best. I think the impetus from the help guide is to be as "objective" as possible when writing the description but there are so many anecdotal stories (my own included) where really selling your part in an activity can make a huge difference in scoring. One of my mentors admonished me saying that if I didn't sell myself as much as possible, I would stand out from the crowd (not in a good way), since everyone is doing it. I hear the dissenting opinions and I get it - I think the point is that there's a line between embellishing an activity and being 2 dimensional about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...