equus Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Do I need to take physics in university to have enough knowledge to do well on the MCAT, or would grade 12 physics suffice? I own a grade 12 physics textbook that I could use to study with. I just don't think I'm going to be able to fit in a physics course before I write the exam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ontariostudent Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I wrote the MCAT 5 years after finishing grade 12 Physics, using the EK Physics book. I studied for the MCAT for only a month or so. I didn't ace the Physics, but I did well enough to get into Canadian med schools! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laura_333 Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 I think gr. 12 level is appropriate, and then supplement with an MCAT book with a section on physics ( I used Kaplan and it was good, there are many other good ones too) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xi88 Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 Grade 12 physics is enough. However, you should definately look over it again. Get the EK book. In high school and in university classes, you memorize equations and concepts. The MCAT does not test what you can memorize. The MCAT tests how well you can think by asking you what you understand and how you can apply the stuff you've memorized. Just memorizing the equations and the facts is usually not enough for the MCAT; you have to understand what it means, and why it is that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w8kg6 Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 I don't remember doing any magnetic fields or electric circuits in HS Physics, so I'd definitely brush up on those (as well as everything else I guess, lol). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terryann Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 In comparing EK, PR, and Kaplan which books are the best for someone with no university physics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
future_doc Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 I wouldn't bet my future on it, and I'm not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xi88 Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 In comparing EK, PR, and Kaplan which books are the best for someone with no university physics EK is best. PR and Kaplan tend to have way too much material than what is needed. EK is straight to the point, and tells you exactly what you need to know. The only negative about EK is that there are not enough practice questions, so you'd have to supplement with some AAMC practice tests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowplay Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 I found that high school physics and the first year physics courses at University covered pretty much the same material. It should be fine, so long as you remember it well. Watch out for things like optics and shearing, though, cause I definitely didn't learn them in high school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deeman101 Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Electricity and magnetism is what you should be concerned with. Followed by optics and waves. If you were good with HS physics then the classical stuff won't be a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericl Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 momentum too ... which was covered in high school but very important! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.