ryacha Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 Ouch, I would have burned some kittens after receiving that score lol Kittens indeed, I was so close and blew it on the one section. Oh well, Manitoba it is Thanks for the stats too, one can always hope, but I think hoping would be futile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawalac Posted September 9, 2010 Report Share Posted September 9, 2010 Kittens indeed, I was so close and blew it on the one section. Oh well, Manitoba it is Thanks for the stats too, one can always hope, but I think hoping would be futile I feel ya. I didn't get as great as an overall score (15, 10, Q, 12), but still in the same boat. I'm still going to apply anyway though. Like mattg said, Queen's doesn't require anything extra application wise, so might as well play a $60 lottery ticket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkhome071590 Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 Hey guys, I'm really sorry to ask this since its probably been brought up before, but just for clarification, if I have a 3.92 gpa for my last two (best two?) years and a cGPA of 3.59, Queen's will consider my last two years and not bother with the cGPA? Will the cGPA still be factored in somehow for the selection process, in other words, will that cGPA still hinder me somehow despite my improved last two years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HBP Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 Hey guys, I'm really sorry to ask this since its probably been brought up before, but just for clarification, if I have a 3.92 gpa for my last two (best two?) years and a cGPA of 3.59, Queen's will consider my last two years and not bother with the cGPA? Will the cGPA still be factored in somehow for the selection process, in other words, will that cGPA still hinder me somehow despite my improved last two years? No, it won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkhome071590 Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Hey thanks for the reply! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markov79 Posted October 21, 2010 Report Share Posted October 21, 2010 The safest bet is probably the following. cGPA 3.75, last 2 years 3.80 MCAT Total 33, V-11, B-11, P10, WS-R That pretty much would guarantee an interview I would think highest cgpa seems to be 3.69 in previous years highest last 2 years appears to be 3.78ish in previous years highest MCAT total score required has been 32 in previous years UWO has used 11 cutoffs for V and B, meaning another med school could do it WS cutoff will never go above R. 33R with min 11 in V/B and 10P with cGPA >3.75 would essentially guarantee an interview. so queen's uses 2 separate cut offs for 2 yr and cumulative gpa. which one do they use if you're applying during 3rd yr? they won't have 3rd yr marks yet, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhD_Candidate_2011 Posted October 22, 2010 Report Share Posted October 22, 2010 I think it's a very ineffective system to rely on hard minimal MCAT cutoffs like Queen's does. I guess they just don't have the resources to go through full reviews on 3000+ applicants like UofT does. So they use these cutoffs to make their job easier. But if the ultimate goal is to pick the best students possible, then these hard cutoffs are the wrong way to go about it. I don't think anyone would argue that a 14/9/14/T candidate should be automatically screened out over someone with 10/10/10/R. If they insist on taking such an absurd approach, minimally they should openly publish their previous year's stats so applicants can save themselves the trouble (and money) of applying and would also cut down on the number of applicants Queen's has to deal with (which to me appears to be the reason for why this cutoff system even exists). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.