scoobydoo1623
Members-
Posts
102 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
scoobydoo1623's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
61
Reputation
-
123321123321B reacted to a post in a topic: MD/PhD Acceptances
-
hello224 reacted to a post in a topic: MD/PhD Acceptances
-
o_o reacted to a post in a topic: MD/PhD Acceptances
-
MD/PhD Acceptances
scoobydoo1623 replied to monkeybrain2's topic in University of Toronto Medical School
deleted. -
verycaffeinated reacted to a post in a topic: UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
-
TheToothFairy reacted to a post in a topic: UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
-
scoobydoo1623 reacted to a post in a topic: UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
-
throwaway3321 reacted to a post in a topic: UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
-
UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
scoobydoo1623 replied to newmy88's topic in University of Toronto Medical School
Thank you! Wishing you luck with securing an invite. I did not write an AEE! My wGPA was simply 3.80 with the new formula. -
UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
scoobydoo1623 replied to newmy88's topic in University of Toronto Medical School
That's obvious. And I do not think it's possible for me to exaggerate the impact of the new wGPA formula for those with high cGPAs because there essentially is no impact. I think that's clearly understood with this new wGPA formula and was not really what I was trying to allude to. But, I guess that's the controversy with this new wGPA formula, which was meant to "even the playing field"... I would assume that because most applicants do NOT have ~4.00 cGPA, this would mean that interview invites would show people with slightly lower wGPAs getting invites this cycle in particular. Based on what has been posted so far (keeping in mind, poster bias), this does not appear to be the case. That's why I just wanted to check if people were aware of the new wGPA formula, since these very high wGPA invites might be misleading to premed hopefuls! I have vowed not to post my stats on this, but to give some hope to applicants who are worried about the disproportionate impact of the new wGPA formula on their chances for an interview: I interviewed for the first weekend, as a grad applicant, with a wGPA of 3.80 (old wGPA would've been >3.90). I hope this gives most applicants some hope! Hang in there! -
UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
scoobydoo1623 replied to newmy88's topic in University of Toronto Medical School
For people getting interview invites, are you guys taking into account that the wGPA formula has changed for UofT starting this cycle? These wGPA seem REALLY high considering the new wGPA formula was expected to tank most people's wGPA relative to previous cycles. Just checking... LOL -
Iamacat reacted to a post in a topic: UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
-
TheFlyGuy reacted to a post in a topic: UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
-
UofT Interview Invites/Regrets 2020/2021
scoobydoo1623 replied to newmy88's topic in University of Toronto Medical School
It's irrelevant for "file review score" purposes (no extra credit), but they would still need to know if you intend on finishing your course-based masters before you potentially matriculate. -
goodVibesOnly reacted to a post in a topic: Western interview invites/regrets 2021
-
scoobydoo1623 reacted to a post in a topic: Western interview invites/regrets 2021
-
MD/PhD Interviews are out
scoobydoo1623 replied to scoobydoo1623's topic in Queen's University Medical School
Thanks! These were my thoughts as well. -
MD/PhD Interviews are out
scoobydoo1623 replied to scoobydoo1623's topic in Queen's University Medical School
Congratulations! Yes, a bit confusing. Just goes to show you that just because they *say* their admissions process is a certain way on their website, doesn't mean that they actually do it. LOL did it say you would automatically be invited for an MD interview if you opted out, or? -
Title. Was not successful. Congratulations to all those with invites!!! EDIT: A bit confused. On the website, it says: "Applications are first assessed by the Admissions Committee for the Undergraduate MD Program, and only if the applicant is invited for interview, will the application be reviewed and ranked by the MD/PhD-MD/Master’s Program Committee." This means that the reason someone is not offered an interview for MD/PhD is because: 1) MD program did not want them or 2) MD wanted them, but MD/PhD did not want them But, in my rejection letter, it says my application will be put back into the MD-only pool. Why would it be put back into MD-only, assuming reasons 1) or 2) are true? Wouldn't they theoretically know the status of my MD application given that it was first assessed by MD-only? Has anyone not been offered an MD/PhD interview, but an MD-only interview at Queens? Or any other schools, for that matter?
-
Scrubadubdub reacted to a post in a topic: Verifier Contacting
-
Verifier Contacting
scoobydoo1623 replied to corgi321's topic in University of Western Ontario Medical School
I was wondering the same thing! I think it's a good sign, and indicative that you have passed academic cut-offs (for whatever stream you are in). From the perspective of the adcoms, I don't see the point in reaching out to verifiers if they haven't assessed whether or not the applicant in question has met cutoffs. It's more work and a waste of time. So, I think your interpretation is correct, since I imagine they would narrow the pool down before actually reading our essays/verifiers -
I never understood why they switched from Facebook Lives to the exclusive and limited Zoom sessions. Does anyone who attended the session on Dec. 10 have any insights as to what they disclosed during the update?